Haste and You... A guide to the misinformed.

[wish12oz]

facepalm

Fun idea, instead of replying and offering nothing and just trying to put people down, why don't you try being useful, and correct the errors you see. Or is that to hard for you? Or are you just afraid you'll get told how wrong you are, again, like every other time you do it.

[Monchat]

Fun idea, instead of replying and offering nothing and just trying to put people down, why don't you try being useful, and correct the errors you see. Or is that to hard for you? Or are you just afraid you'll get told how wrong you are, again, like every other time you do it.

How about you correct it yourself, since you troll in every page of this thread, I think you could do it? Or maybe you just have no idea what youre talking about? hint: read the wiki, very well explained over there.


The OP should be modified and include two facts:

- 50% haste is not 2x damage, 80% haste is not 5x damage. Why? because there is a (huge) delay after every job ability and weapon skills you use ( 2seconds+); this is not modified by haste, and your idle time is all the more important that you have high haste. 2 second delay when you take 8 second to get 100 TP ( SAM) means you're idle 20% of the time for example.


- a very important part of multihits from double/triple/etc attacks does not contribute to WS frequency. 80% DA would be +80% melee dmg but certainly not +80% WS damage. more like 60%.

[wish12oz]

How about you correct it yourself, since you troll in every page of this thread, I think you could do it? Or maybe you just have no idea what youre talking about? hint: read the wiki, very well explained over there.

It was already corrected or I would of done it, maybe you should try reading the thread instead of making sock puppet accounts pchan.

So mele damage over time over time?

lol

(sword strap testing is) Somewhere on BG (maybe i think i saw it this one time over there in that place you know the one ya there with that thing by that guy who said it and was right and stuff)

My searching didn't find it, maybe you could post a link? Or just say it hasn't been tested, either way.