GMs haven't dropped any balls. They're simply following the rules and terms as they've been given by SE.
GMs haven't dropped any balls. They're simply following the rules and terms as they've been given by SE.
the only time I think an NM should be taken is if everyone dies or most die and the few remain cant hold it while the others HP since they didnt have reraise... people should seriously exercise the golden role, don't steal monsters unless you want yours to be stolen... I swear the things people do to build negative karma and breed hostility towards them baffles me...
What really needs to be fixed are the hate mechanics, someone mentioned large amounts of VE on the monster makes it so you can keep claim, wouldn't it have been even more simple in the beginning if say
hate != 0 monster says claimed? then run that check on everyone in the alliance thats engaged to it? Would of made HNM fights less amusing.
I have the final form of Aegis, it has 40 Def Augments Shield bash V and Magic Damage Taken -45%... The ultimate form!
uh... If you have an entire group of people charmed and someone claims the NM, shouldnt your entire crowd of people be chasing them down and kicking their butts, since you're charmed and all?
Claim system should be more absolute I agree. Entire hate list should have to be cleared before it goes yellow.
Not quite. The situation you described would happen, but not because of Enmity. The "Original" player only requires 1 action taken on a white mob that is aggressive or was previously claimed to them in order to claim it. Any "Intruder" player requires 2 consecutive actions taken on a white mob in order to claim it.
Eg: If you cast Dia and then Dia 2 on the NM while the Mnk was getting up, even if the Mnk had truckloads more hate than you, you would have claim. If you cast Dia and then the Mnk hit the NM, the Mnk would keep claim because they only require 1 action whereas you would have required 2.
There is a fairly massive advantage to the "Original" party in terms of keeping claim.
This is true.
I still feel it's a moral code break. The NM can be popped up to three times now, correct? If so, then it wasn't as if they were simply waiting their turn for the ??? and just happened to take up the white NM while party was charmed. Clearly intentional. And for them to say they couldn't wait to steal again is also harassment in my book.
But I'm not a GM and it's not against the ToS. The GMs are doing their jobs based on the ToS, not their moral conduct.
I disagree. All it takes to lose a mid-charm Ciren-Croin is two blms with stun. I failed to take claim AS the mob went white with flash in such a situation. After that we always had 1 melee with hate stay out of range to focus on claiming asap during charm. People tend to be very aggressive at claiming that mob as it uses charm... which is fine. Wiping the other group when they got charmed was fun.![]()
I disagree with your post. I cast flash throughout the course of the fight in the interest of having hate on the mob. Being ready to cast flash as Ciren-Croin uses mayhem lantern implies that you're not already mid-cure or doing other white magely type jobs. Sure you could argue that really you should have the blm on top of that sort of thing but often they're mid-nuke. The only answer for us was to have a melee sit out and focus on establishing hate as mayhem lantern was readied. People shouldn't be so eager to gank a mob... but I appreciate that that's how things go in abyssea.
|
|
© SQUARE ENIX FINAL FANTASY, SQUARE ENIX, and the SQUARE ENIX logo are registered trademarks of Square Enix Holdings Co., Ltd. Vana'diel , Tetra Master, PLAYONLINE, the PLAYONLINE logo, Rise of the Zilart, Chains of Promathia, Treasures of Aht Urhgan, and Wings of the Goddess are registered trademarks of Square Enix Co., Ltd. The rating icon is a registered trademark of the Entertainment Software Association. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. Online play requires internet connection. |