[ATTN] (One-Handed) Relic Weapon Offhand Limitation

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Cream_Soda

Not sure about Glanz, I konw they did wargfangs (Magian trial wep), but Spharai's triple dmg proc certainly only work on one first, so Vereth certainly isn't the only one.

---

Worse than that, it can only happen on the very first swing of the attack round..

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Vyvian

Worse than that, it can only happen on the very first swing of the attack round..

---

Yea, I knew that, just wasn't 100% sure if it was the first or the second (as for some reason Vereth is the second swing, go figure).

No worries, I'm sure they'll do something nice w/ Spharai for 99. Keep on monkin'!

Yeah, its main hand for spharai, first attempt only. Although I wonder if you really know which hand got the double attack. My character always seems alternate swings regardless, I just know what happened based on how many total swings there were. The only exception I found to that was when you got extra hits on Faith Baghnakhs, those swung the same hand.

When i say main/offhand, I always just go off of the chat log, mainhand hits first, offhand hits second.

for real. 2handers don't get to complain about grips being underpowered when SE basically re-wrote the game to accommodate them.

not only do they get free bonus att and acc due to the enhanced conversion rate, they actually get a higher cap on pdif just by the merit of.. holding there weapon with both hands? so totally justified.......

^ You ever see the kind of damage a Claymore can do?

The 2H update was 100% justified and badly needed.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Alhanelem

putting [ATTN] in your post isn't going to get you more attention than if you didn't put it there. So don't do it.

---

lol thanks jesus

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Malacite

^ You ever see the kind of damage a Claymore can do?

The 2H update was 100% justified and badly needed.

---

You ever see the kind of damage an arbalest can do? (a man portable crossbow with a windlass drawn spring steel bow that was accurate to 400+ yards and could punch straight through steel plate armor) Or for that matter a gun?

Making ranged weapons stronger than melee would also be 100% justified and badly needed. And for that matter ranged weapons originally ignoring defense was also 100% justified.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Alhanelem

putting [ATTN] in your post isn't going to get you more attention than if you didn't put it there. So don't do it.

---

Lick your own asshole ^^

i don't read any thread that DOESN'T include [ATTN] in the title.

how else would i know which threads to pay [ATTN] to?