Quote Originally Posted by Ivtrix View Post
damn this is getting bookmarked
For being a deflection and ad hominem? I guess you do you...

I mean, literally what just happened is a person made a claim, was asked to support it, refused to provide any evidence to support it while attacking the person that asked for the evidence, and then you supported their refusing to support the claim, a claim you have a mutual interested in people believing is true but likely cannot actually support because it likely isn't true. If it's not true, then a lot of the bad behavior here loses its fig leaf defense and the people doing it would be exposed as just behaving badly with no excuse.

Even the excuse is a thin one, but shorn of it, there'd be no defense at all.

Quote Originally Posted by VelKallor View Post
Renathras?

"People are snowflakes" is a nice way of deflecting the fact that the person got the banhammer for their behaviour, and nothing else. If they got reported, and that persons behaviour made disciplinary action necessary, then if ANYONE is responsible for getting banned..the blame lies solely AND ONLY with the person whose conduct was deemed unacceptable.

In short?

Actions have consequences.
I mean, fair. But the point is, I'm not connected to it in any way, as I neither made any such reports nor was I even conversing with/the target of the person's conversation.