t2 got ninja nerfed?

[Toonces]

Here is the thread:
http://forum.square-enix.com/ffxiv/threads/147035

Also mentioned in this thread where they list any changes that were not indicated on patch notes (which could also be bugs):
http://forum.square-enix.com/ffxiv/threads/146932

[Elvin]

That link is not about that, I think.

And the hour is prepatch, so...it can't be about that

Edit: Talking about the link posted by hysterior, checking the others now

[Gaarv]

lol, once again, so much for "working as intented".

[Iymala]

Awesome if they changed it. It is a great fight for teams to learn how to communicate and work together before harder turns of coil.

[Myrhn]

Took them a while lol. Now everybody do the rot. Also don'w worry too much soon on patch 2.2 you can get the echo buff and probably do the enrage again

[Mergadeth]

So can we confirm or deny without a doubt that the enrage method is no longer viable and has been made impossible to heal through?

[Arkista]

Well if so a lot of people just got screwed over.... I'll check and see if they did, haven't done CoB on my other account. Ewww 36min update. I prefer passing rot over the enrage method, because it takes longer to do. But there are a lot of people that just don't get it, Even with Voice Chat people have issues passing rot.

This is what I don't get The DEV team posted about this about a month or so ago and pretty much said it was ok. Why would they Buff it now when 2.2 is around the corner?

[Tiggy]

lol, once again, so much for "working as intented".

Working as intended never ever means that they won't decide later on to change it. It simply means that at the moment they said that it was working as intended. It is in no way shape or form a statement about any possible changes or balance tweaks. They said the same thing about the changes to Dark Devices, and lo and behold working as intended still ended up being patched out later. Just because it's working as intended does not mean it's permanent.

[Nekodar]

lol, once again, so much for "working as intented".

As far as I can recall, the response was that they didn't consider it an "exploit", and didn't have any immediate plans to change it.
That's quite different from "working as intended".

And if they did indeed destroy the enrage method this brings up a larger issue. One where we can't believe anything SE says or promises. To me it just sets a nasty precedent of lying to the consumer base and making changes they said they weren't going to make, in secret.

Not planning any immediate change means it won't be hotfixed in a day or two. It does not mean they won't change it ever.

[Sove92]

And if they did indeed destroy the enrage method this brings up a larger issue. One where we can't believe anything SE says or promises. To me it just sets a nasty precedent of lying to the consumer base and making changes they said they weren't going to make, in secret.

What they said is that it is not an exploit, and that there are no immediate plans to change it. If it was an exploit, it would have been fixed long ago. "Working as intended" and "not and exploit" don't translate to "We won't do anything about it".