A Dev or Rep response would be awesome.
But, i recently ran the new Arr benchmark and also the old ffxiv benchmark and both scores were horrible. The 1.0 score was worse than the 2.0 score.Though i ran 1.0 on medium settings with no problems so my question is will it be the same case with Arr?
or am i DOOMED?!?!?!
/cry ARR score 587; 1.0 score 253
PC specs(horrible)
SYSTEM_OS Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit (6.1, Build 7601) Service Pack 1 (7601.win7sp1_gdr.120830-0333)
SYSTEM_CPU AMD Athlon(tm) II P360 Dual-Core Processor (2 CPUs), ~2.3GHz
SYSTEM_CORE_NUM SYSTEM_CORE_LOGIC 2 SYSTEM_CORE_PHYSICS 2
SYSTEM_BIOS BIOS Date: 01/09/10 15:17:22 Ver: 08.00.10
SYSTEM_LANGAGE English (Regional Setting: English)
SYSTEM_MEMORY 3835.816MB
SYSTEM_VIRTUAL_MEMORY 2047.875MB
SYSTEM_PAGE_FILE 7669.824MB
SYSTEM_STORAGE C:\ SYSTEM_HARDDISK_DRIVE SYSTEM_TOTALDISC_SPACE 283.343GB SYSTEM_FREEDISC_SPACE 127.665GB
SYSTEM_DIRECTX_VERSION DirectX 11
SYSTEM_GRAPHICS ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4200 Series
SYSTEM_GRAPHICS_DEVICE \\.\DISPLAY1
Benchmark Questions
Printable View
-
02-23-2013, 03:26 AMlolodinBenchmark Questions
-
02-23-2013, 03:28 AMrina_inverse
Define horrible, and please post your spec
-
02-23-2013, 03:41 AMShougun
If you could play 1.0 as unplayable then I dont see how you cant play ARR as unplayable :D
In this case you have a better unplayable score lolol
You can also try things like window mode smaller resolution then your actual desktop, turning off shadows, and other bells and whistles, grass and stuff - should add to the FPS. But if you could play at 250... however choppy that may be.. then probably in ARR too lol
Also do you have two GPUs (sli/crossfire)? -
02-23-2013, 03:44 AMlolodin
nah my laptop sucks but i'm just asking because i ran 1.0 on medium no problems but the benchmark score is so low so im not understanding whats going on
-
02-23-2013, 03:47 AMShougunBenchmarks are not perfect, also the level of playability is partially an opinion. I know many who will die with frames under 60 and other who play comfortably at 15.Quote:
Originally Posted by lolodin
If you already have or when you get Beta that would be were you should tell SE if ARR is running worse then 1.0 (definitely shouldn't be running worse lol) -
02-23-2013, 03:47 AMSigny
An Ati HD 4200 its pretty old card and the lowest end on that generation. You should considered an upgrade.
-
02-23-2013, 03:49 AMPseudopsiaBeing able to run and being playable is two different things. You probably will be able to run the game, however your frame rate must be awful most points in the game.Quote:
Originally Posted by lolodin
-
02-23-2013, 03:51 AMArkh
Yes, you cant play it. Time to upgrade, your hardware is terrible
-
02-23-2013, 03:52 AMlolodinim broke :/Quote:
Originally Posted by Signy
yea it does at times but its manageable its nothing too badQuote:
Being able to run and being playable is two different things. You probably will be able to run the game, however your frame rate must be awful at some points in the game.
-
02-23-2013, 04:02 AMAkira_Tenshi
There is always the PS3 version.
-
02-23-2013, 04:12 AMlolodin
well of course but ur not understanding me i had a way low benchmark score for both yet i played 1.0 on medium so with the same be said for the 2.0 version is my question im not made out of money so i cant upgrade my pc so.
-
02-23-2013, 04:21 AMMeatdawg
1.0 was more demanding then ARR
If you could play 1.0 you can play ARR -
02-23-2013, 04:25 AMCedri
As a computer tech, I looked on in horror at the specs you were trying to game on...
-
02-23-2013, 04:28 AMArkh
Buy the ps3 version then, is cheap
-
02-23-2013, 04:30 AMlolodinlol it wasnt badQuote:
Originally Posted by Cedri
and @Arkh i have a ps3 :P -
02-23-2013, 04:34 AMArkh
If you have a ps3, get the game on that. And use the pc for the voice chat part :D
-
02-23-2013, 04:38 AMCedriLet me put this into a bit of perspective for you. I'm not trying to be a douche or anything, but your computer is outdated. Passmark if you're not familiar with it has a chart of all high, mid range and low end cards. Your graphics card does not even EXIST on any of those lists.Quote:
Originally Posted by lolodin
Edit: my mistake it does exist it scored 93 out of a possibe 5,548 -
02-23-2013, 04:44 AMlolodinI know my computer is Outdated ive said multiple times it sucks lol but for it being this crappy i had few problems with playing the game i am just curious on how accurate or inaccurate the benchmark is thats itQuote:
Originally Posted by Cedri
-
02-23-2013, 04:52 AMCedriIt's 90% accurate.Quote:
Originally Posted by lolodin
-
02-23-2013, 05:01 AMSignyYeap, you'll probably could play ARR on you pc but with everything as low as possible and getting low fps on crowed areas.Quote:
Originally Posted by Cedri
-
02-23-2013, 05:07 AMNamudNevets
Bottom line if you ran 1.o in any playable way then you WILL b able to run 2.0 with better results. Or you can dish out $40 for ps3 game or $90 for a new gpu.
Question is how broke is broke? Still have a few months b4 release. -
02-23-2013, 06:46 AMkazaran
HD4000 Mobile will have issues, it is a subpar gpu used for low demand applications. Get a Laptop with a GT650 series and I7 and you will get a very high score. Such a laptop is around 800.00 (more if you put in a second solid state drive).
-
02-23-2013, 06:57 AMRadacci
Can you save the benchmark score, and post?
you might wanna play on lower res etc.
Also you can look at catalyst settings (if you got that) it might be that you are overriding some game settings, or using high settings, that slow down the game.
try turning off anti aliasing etc. it doesn't do much for edges that i noticed, but lowers scores a bit. check lod boxes, turn of glare, occlusion.