Maybe I'm super blind, but...

Printable View

11-15-2011, 02:58 AM
Antanias

Maybe I'm super blind, but...

...I've been looking through the Goldsmith recipes on the Lodestone and I'm not seeing any recipes for non-dated rings/earrings. Sure I can go ahead and make some dated jewelry, but where are the non-dated accessories?
11-15-2011, 02:59 AM
quantumsaint

Not implemented yet. Probably will be in 1.20.
11-15-2011, 03:14 AM
yukikaze_yanagi

^ there's no new recipe for goldsmith, alchemy and cooking. They'll show up in next patch
11-15-2011, 03:21 AM
Keith_Dragoon

So until then we are forced to nom dated ham sandwiches D:
11-15-2011, 03:24 AM
zaviermhigo

I'm guessing goldsmith rings and jewelry are being saved for the "dropping of slot cost" for jewelry. He said we'd be able to wear every piece of jewelry that we have a slot for at once, but for that jewelry must become less potent. I'm guessing they're rebalancing stats on jewelry now, and we'll see them back by 1.20 or 1.21. Without it, it kills goldsmith. You still have weapons and little things you make, but jewelry was a main repairing/making market for goldsmith. While my goldsmith is not leveled high I feel sympathy as a crafter, being a weaver if they took away the ability to make body pieces of something crucial to the class, I wouldn't be happy, so here's to hoping they bring jewelry back in 1.20.
11-15-2011, 03:39 AM
Deceptistar

Quote:

Originally Posted by zaviermhigo

I'm guessing goldsmith rings and jewelry are being saved for the "dropping of slot cost" for jewelry. He said we'd be able to wear every piece of jewelry that we have a slot for at once, but for that jewelry must become less potent. I'm guessing they're rebalancing stats on jewelry now, and we'll see them back by 1.20 or 1.21. Without it, it kills goldsmith. You still have weapons and little things you make, but jewelry was a main repairing/making market for goldsmith. While my goldsmith is not leveled high I feel sympathy as a crafter, being a weaver if they took away the ability to make body pieces of something crucial to the class, I wouldn't be happy, so here's to hoping they bring jewelry back in 1.20.

Its really not that bad atm. Theres alot of demand for the rings and such only for materia lol
11-15-2011, 03:45 AM
zaviermhigo

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deceptistar

Its really not that bad atm. Theres alot of demand for the rings and such only for materia lol

Yeah I guess with newer people they'd still need to buy rings never thought of that, sometimes I think in my "everyone already has their rings and crap", but I never think about new people or people who didn't have rings :/ Its early still for me haha.
11-15-2011, 04:21 AM
Irondude

i wonder if you will be able to make materia rings, earrings, bracelets and necklaces. The level requirements would have to change though unless they are going to allow 20+ str rings to be equiped at 41. It would have to only allow tier 1 or tier 2. That might actually give those materia value!
11-15-2011, 05:09 AM
Antanias

I remember hearing that culinarians and Alchemists were getting updated recipes in 1.20. Didn't think about other recipes being added alongside them.
11-15-2011, 05:29 AM
Geesus

Deceptistar? Your sig cracks me up. xD Except I thought the Grid salute was more like the I Dream of Jeannie "magic nod" lol http://i600.photobucket.com/albums/t...photos/1-1.jpg
11-15-2011, 05:50 AM
Viridiana

^^That, and the LL salute is actually British, not American. :p
11-15-2011, 05:55 AM
Dreadnought

Quote:

Originally Posted by Viridiana

^^That, and the LL salute is actually British, not American. :p

how is it not american? why cant it be both? our troops have always saluted like that.
11-15-2011, 05:56 AM
Molly_Millions

all jewelry is dated
11-15-2011, 06:08 AM
Viridiana

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dreadnought

how is it not american? why cant it be both? our troops have always saluted like that.

US troops and British troops actually salute slightly differently. The British (and LL) salute show the back of the hand when viewed from the front. The American one shows the edge of the hand when viewed from the front. Also, Americans don't do the stomp to attention thing that the British and LL soldiers do. >_>
11-15-2011, 06:42 AM
Geesus

Quote:

Originally Posted by Viridiana

^^That, and the LL salute is actually British, not American. :p

Actually, the salute as far as the hand placement and position is American. The foot stomp could be British.

http://i600.photobucket.com/albums/t...1321306711.jpg

That is definitely not palm out but palm in. Here are the respective salutes and that is much closer to US Military than British as far as the hand goes.

http://i600.photobucket.com/albums/t...alute_1300.jpg

And tbh, after serving in the military, no offense to General Gates, his salute is "unsat" and lazy.
11-15-2011, 06:50 AM
Molly_Millions

Quote:

Originally Posted by Geesus

Actually, the salute as far as the hand placement and position is American. The foot stomp could be British.

That is definitely not palm out but palm in.

The palm shouldn't be facing in, the edge of your hand should be facing out as the poster above you pointed out. If we want to get technical, it's also not correct because the elbow is drooping too much.
11-15-2011, 06:54 AM
Geesus

Quote:

Originally Posted by Molly_Millions

The palm shouldn't be facing in, the edge of your hand should be facing out as the poster above you pointed out. If we want to get technical, it's also not correct because the elbow is drooping too much.

I edited the above post; either way, it's a combination of both and also, I'm not going to "debate" which of whose salute it is. I chose it because it reminds me of the Navy in which I served so ... enjoy either of your opinions/choices.
11-15-2011, 06:54 AM
Irondude

oh great attack of the how-to-salute nerds.
11-15-2011, 06:56 AM
Viridiana

Okay, so I never zoomed in to see if it was palm in or out, but considering that the American one is palm-down. . . Well, I can't say that it's closer to the British one for that, but combined with the stomping, I'd still peg it as overall closer to the British salute.

Also, yay for completely derailing this topic. :D
11-15-2011, 07:06 AM
Molly_Millions

Quote:

Originally Posted by Geesus

I edited the above post; either way, it's a combination of both and also, I'm not going to "debate" which of whose salute it is. I chose it because it reminds me of the Navy in which I served so ... enjoy either of your opinions/choices.

Indeed, I served in the army. Although I chose Uldah because it made sense for my character's narrative.
11-15-2011, 07:31 AM
Antanias

Quote:

Originally Posted by Molly_Millions

all jewelry is dated

Right, and the topic was regarding non-dated recipies. Guess we'll be waiting until the slot costs are removed (whenver that might be).
11-15-2011, 10:29 AM
Airget

Quote:

Originally Posted by zaviermhigo

I'm guessing goldsmith rings and jewelry are being saved for the "dropping of slot cost" for jewelry. He said we'd be able to wear every piece of jewelry that we have a slot for at once, but for that jewelry must become less potent. I'm guessing they're rebalancing stats on jewelry now, and we'll see them back by 1.20 or 1.21. Without it, it kills goldsmith. You still have weapons and little things you make, but jewelry was a main repairing/making market for goldsmith. While my goldsmith is not leveled high I feel sympathy as a crafter, being a weaver if they took away the ability to make body pieces of something crucial to the class, I wouldn't be happy, so here's to hoping they bring jewelry back in 1.20.

The fear I have with the changes to jewelry is will it force people to use up more inv space for gear to get the same effect they could've gotten with 12/12. Since they do have to adjust the potency of the jewelry to balance it out to me it feels like we'll just need to wear more to get the same effect we could've gotten before if we just stuck with the 12/12 limit lol.