Please Devs Make a Command To Hide "Off Hand" Some People Hate Shield And Cant Double Wield No Point In Hiding A Sword More Point Hiding The Shield Please I "BEG" You DEVS T.T Before The Patch Comes Out :( The Point Is For Looks And To Maintain Shield Stats
(READ) HIDE MAIN? O.0 Wath about OFF? I HATE THE SHIELD!!!
Printable View
-
10-01-2011, 12:45 AMSithisx(READ) HIDE MAIN? O.0 Wath about OFF? I HATE THE SHIELD!!!
-
10-01-2011, 12:49 AMEekikiYou can unequip the shield if you don't want it to be seen. Settle down and learn to punctuate.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sithisx
-
10-01-2011, 01:02 AMSithisx
No Stats If I Unequip <.< The Point Is For looks Not a Loss In Stats So Dont Be Agresive
-
10-01-2011, 01:03 AMAlexNiculaie
Seriously? SMH
-
10-01-2011, 01:08 AMGramulThe whole point of hiding the main is because you can't unequip it. Besides, if you enter battle, the weapon comes back.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sithisx
Hiding the shield would be pointless. Stats are only useful in battle, and it will have to appear anyway when in battle. -
10-01-2011, 01:09 AMSithisx
Not SMH Is To HIDE The Shield While Equiped In The Off Hand T.T Omg
-
10-01-2011, 01:11 AMAkira_Tenshi
God, i hate this feature so much. It's so stupid. I do not want to see people pulling weapons from out of thin air.
Edit: Am i the only one that thinks this is a pointless feature that nobody asked for? Also, does anyone agree that it should stay so that it only hides your weapon from yourself and not other players? There has been plenty of people ranting on these forums about how important immersion is and how it is important things are believable. I know it is a fantasy game but pulling a giant axe from the inside of your back is just plain stupid. -
10-01-2011, 01:12 AMPicoman
'No stats when hidden'
reallah...
how about...
'You only need stats while in combat... entering combat removes hidden effect' -
10-01-2011, 01:16 AMAlexNiculaieI'm going to go out on a limb and assume that you are not a native English speaker. I dearly hope that is the case at any rate. . .Quote:
Not SMH Is To HIDE The Shield While Equiped In The Off Hand T.T Omg
Seriously, if you don't want to see it, don't equip it. When ready to fight then do. Or are you honestly thinking you should be holding your invisible shield out to deflect hits while fighting, because that is just stupid. Sorry, just my opinion. -
10-01-2011, 01:18 AMAkira_Tenshi
Also please don't give Square Enix any more stupid ideas or we will all be fighting with invisible weapons and shields.
-
10-01-2011, 01:50 AMSithisx
Im Not in tune whit the Inv weapon its stupid and has no point im whit the No Weps from thin air i just said about shield cause of the glads who want to only wield a wep in one hand but they get neglected in party for it SE Should Remove that hidden main wep thing
-
10-01-2011, 01:51 AMPikachuLink
i thought there were plans to hide main hand so everyone wouldnt see it and offhand as well calm down not important anyway
-
10-01-2011, 01:55 AMSithisx
true dont know why people get so agresive about this
-
10-01-2011, 01:56 AMRenshi
Just a question.
Why would you need to Not show your Shield when you have to fight? -
10-01-2011, 01:57 AMChoyi
The main trait of the gladiator is using their shield to improve defence and fullfill the party role as a tank.
Wielding a shield in melee combat its one of the features that defines the Gladiator class in the game.
Perhaps you should consider playing another class since you clearly don't enjoy a sword and board type playstyle.
Cause what you suggest is very silly, either you want to fight blocking with an invisible shield or you want to fight without using any of the shields features (aka you would be useless in a party)but keeping its stats (lol). -
10-01-2011, 01:58 AMPrettyPrincess
I believe MH=Main Hande
and
OH=Off Hand. Off hand would be shield. You now have the option to hide your off hand equipment. -
10-01-2011, 01:58 AMGramulQuote:
Originally Posted by Sithisx
Quote:
I HATE THE SHIELD!!!
Quote:
I "BEG" You DEVS T.T
The only aggressive one here seems to be you.Quote:
T.T Omg
-
10-01-2011, 01:59 AMDelsus
The reason we were given the option to hide main was because for the summer event, it didnt look right in a swimsuit with a weapon/tool, so this was what they came up with, 1.18a started it by hiding it on your screen and this is them finishing.
You can just unequip you shield if you want, then equip it when you want to fight. You shouldnt need to hide it out of battle because you dont need the starts.
Seriously how long will people ask for /display underwear off can I have it. its getting stupid now, main is one thing because it cant be unequipped and nothing else is needed for any reason because you can just unequip, then when you set off to do leves, grind, quests or any other battle content reequip it.
Edit: Or if you dont like shield dont level Gladiator get on PUG, MRD or LNC then you dont have to use a shield, simple anyone with a brain could solve you epic problem. -
10-01-2011, 02:24 AMZantetsuken
Here comes the WAAAAAAAMBULANCE...
Players will be asking for the ability to toggle the visuals for every piece of gear at this rate.
Weapon toggle was done for swimsuits and because you cant unequip your weapon. If you don't like your shield, take it off.
Sheesh. -
10-01-2011, 02:33 AMRoyal
Just make /hide clothes and be done with it. Lets all run around in our birthday suit. Just install stripper poles at the camps to help kill some time.
-
10-01-2011, 02:37 AMPrettyPrincessbest idea ever. +1Quote:
Originally Posted by Royal
-
10-01-2011, 02:41 AMEekikiI've been campaigning for this since day 1.Quote:
Originally Posted by Royal
-
10-01-2011, 02:48 AMFiosha_Maureiba
Just curious Sithisx, are you using speech recognition in a single breath, then saying Cap That to get the first letter capital effect? I can't imagine someone intentionally capitalizing the first letter of each word except for articles... wait, I take that back.
Anyhew, I believe the shield should remain if it's being used. Unless they introduce shield rings of some sort, an equipped hsield should show itself.