Give us a 8v8v8 que for Slaughter
I've ran 5 of them in the past two days and they're way more enjoyable.
This would also alleviate the Que times , and the congestion and spam fest of the 24 man
Melee can actually do work in this one and BLMs have to move around and can be easily weeded out
Make this happpeeennn
DEVS Please
Printable View
-
02-13-2015, 12:52 PMZhycranaDranixDEVS Please
-
02-13-2015, 04:01 PMzeopower6
8v8v8 is so much more fun and less laggy. But 8 man premades are a no go IMO.
-
02-13-2015, 05:03 PMjlewissI don't see this happening if anything it would make the que times worseQuote:
Originally Posted by ZhycranaDranix
-
02-13-2015, 06:31 PMUlricCraftHuh?Quote:
Originally Posted by jlewiss
If there was 8v8v8 Solo Queue Slaughter & 72man, I'd queue for both. And I bet finding 23 players is a hell of a lot faster than finding 71.
8v8v8, YES PLEASE! -
02-13-2015, 06:43 PMNargaHuntress
Been thinking about this for the past month or so, just to lazy to make a thread. But i honestly do hope they take this into serious consideration. Secure is all i play and like you said the 8v8v8 matches are much more fun. Even when im forced to do brain numbing slaughter the 24 man is just more fun. Please could we have this as an option? It honestly couldnt hurt to just add it in.
-
02-13-2015, 11:39 PMRed_WolfFrom what I've seen in this game, every time they add option in the Duty Finder the Q gets longer. I think people get stuck into "dead" instances when they really want the first available instance. It is horrible programming IMHO.Quote:
Originally Posted by UlricCraft
FL's got a lot more people with this last patch but because it added an option the Q's got much worse. I think giving the FL Roulette a decent reward and making it available for Light Parties will quicken Q times, bring Secure back to life, and increase the 24 man instances. -
02-14-2015, 12:22 AMStormrider
I think they should just kill 72 slaughter period. Make all slaughter 24. Then there is no dead instance. You are still going to end up with premades stomping pugs. In the few matches I have been in with a whole 8 man adders. If maelstrom isn't playing for second or last place and push the Adders(premade). The game stays really close and it can be won by any team.
-
02-14-2015, 12:52 AMAtreus
How 'bout if you merged it into one queue? All 72-man matches turn into Secure with 24-man matches automatically Slaughter.
That's one way to cut division of the PvP community. -
02-14-2015, 01:59 AMDeeloGreat idea, I think almost everyone could get on board with this. 72-man Secure is good fun, but 24-man Secure is very boring (imo)...72-man Slaughter is not very fun, but 24-man Slaughter is amazingQuote:
Originally Posted by Atreus
-
02-14-2015, 02:20 AMBlubbersThat would be a dreamQuote:
Originally Posted by Atreus
-
02-14-2015, 06:27 AMStormriderThumbs up, email SE now and ask to be in charge.Quote:
Originally Posted by Atreus
-
02-16-2015, 09:44 AMBuff_ArcherAgreed... we're getting the exact opposite of the types of matches that would be fun and where success would be more dependent on strategy than how it works now.Quote:
Originally Posted by Deelo
Case in point, 24 man Secure mode. At first I thought it might be ok but then I realized after a few games that whereas 72 man Secure mode has an even distribution of parties at capture points, with a floating party for mid as well as reinforcing the capture parties should they get outnumbered, balancing things out. If Maelstrom send two parties against Adder's one party at Manors for example, the Adder's B team can respond accordingly. But in 24 man Secure, if one GC sends most of its party against another, that leaves the third party free to easily get 2/3 of the objectives while the other two GC's fight each other for the remainder.