I'm a legacy player but I forgot or didn't pay attention.
How exactly did the game get pushed through in that state. Wasn't there a guy in development going "Naw man, that sucks, stop. Just stop"?
Who was the last director and how and why did he do things the way he did?
So what happened exactly with 1.0?
Printable View
-
08-31-2013, 07:38 AMEmeraldHillSo what happened exactly with 1.0?
-
08-31-2013, 07:40 AMAngelicBeing
Tanaka.
The reason? Hubris. -
08-31-2013, 07:42 AMviion
There are dumb decisions in every project, XIV 1.0 was just looking to take the grand prize. No clear goal, no organization, no structure, and thus a mess of a game was created.
-
08-31-2013, 07:43 AMAlmalexiaThis makes me sick to my stomach.Quote:
Originally Posted by EmeraldHill
-
08-31-2013, 07:47 AMEmeraldHillLegacy as in I bought the original version. Not legacy as in I bought 3 months of game-time for a failing game that was announced dead and being re-made.Quote:
Originally Posted by Almalexia
-
08-31-2013, 07:49 AMZitoHowlettMy mind can't compute the fact that same person who was pretty much responsible for chrono cross was also the reason why XIV 1.0 sucked hard.Quote:
Originally Posted by AngelicBeing
-
08-31-2013, 07:51 AMAlmalexiaokwww npnpQuote:
Originally Posted by EmeraldHill