I know I'm gonna get ripped apart on this, but wouldn't it be better to erase gil, force people to invest in items and start the mkt back up from no gil with people wanting to sell items?
Gil Destruction vs This 1/10th Idea
Printable View
-
10-16-2012, 02:43 AMSeth_AhrimanGil Destruction vs This 1/10th Idea
-
10-16-2012, 02:45 AMJacien
-
10-16-2012, 02:45 AMLadon
No because the 1/10th process has nothing to do with removing gil from the system. Once again, it's redenomination not removal.
-
10-16-2012, 02:46 AMHanabira
no, removing people's hard work will in no way be beneficial for anyone, especially if they want to keep their existing playerbase. the 1/10th scaling idea makes the market more stable, without actually removing anything
-
10-16-2012, 02:46 AMLlenCoram
-
10-16-2012, 02:50 AMHanabira
it would be silly anyways. since existing players and extremely well geared existing players will still dominate the market before new players can even earn well
-
10-16-2012, 02:54 AMdarkstarpoet1the only way this would work is to reset all levels and remove all items people have to start the market back up. i know, personally, i wouldn't even come back to try arr if they had this brilliant idea.Quote:
Originally Posted by Seth_Ahriman
-
10-16-2012, 03:07 AMZantetsukenI'll meet you 90% of the way on this idea.Quote:
Originally Posted by Seth_Ahriman
As it turns out, the devs will too. -
10-16-2012, 03:09 AMFadigre
Can't take these seriously anymore
http://i.imgur.com/aGjFa.gif -
10-16-2012, 03:15 AMWolfie
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redenomination
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redenomination
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redenomination
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redenomination
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redenomination
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redenomination
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redenomination
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redenomination
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redenomination
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redenomination
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redenomination