Get it right folks! Patch 1.2 already happened, we've hade 1.18, 1.19, 1.19a, and then 1.20!
It's 1.20 not 1.2
Printable View
-
11-03-2011, 09:07 AMDecemberIt's 1.20 not 1.2
-
11-03-2011, 09:19 AMAncinda
I know, and this annoys me too, but unfortunately, besides you and me, it seems very few people care
-
11-03-2011, 09:21 AMAnswa
1.02 happened. If you knew decimals, you'd know that
Unless, of course, I'm a total idiot and somehow it's not decimals and for some reason 1.10 came after 1.9, and not 1.09...Quote:
1.2 = 1.20 = 1.200000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
-
11-03-2011, 09:25 AMDefmetalPwned the OP there did ya?Quote:
Originally Posted by Answa
-
11-03-2011, 09:25 AMTiraelinaVersions are not decimals.Quote:
Originally Posted by Answa
-
11-03-2011, 09:27 AMIleanThey may be.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiraelina
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_versioning -
11-03-2011, 09:27 AMAnswaHey, I left the benefit of the doubt at the end there. I even called myself a hypothetical idiot.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiraelina
-
11-03-2011, 09:30 AMAzurus
they are both the same, the versions are moving in a one point increment so 1.20 and 1.2 are still only 1/5th the way in to 2.0. Whether it was intended that way or not does not really matter as most people will take them as being the same anyway, because in this case they are. Has this dug under people skin that bad? lol
-
11-03-2011, 09:32 AMVawn
Well isn't this a stupid thing to argue about.
-
11-03-2011, 09:34 AMMisteyes
Version numbers are not decimals, or any other numbering system that can have math done on it.
It is, in fact, totally legitimate to have version numbers like 7.5.1.
If it ~really~ bothers you, you can think of it as "1-20" rather than "1.20"