Delete rescue from the game.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by romah

You're not going to like what I'm about to say but maybe you're part of the problem right there. I also been playing MMOs for decades and I did stop playing ff14 a few times due to the direction the game was taking. I'm sorry that you feel this way but maybe if you (and other healer mains) actually tried to adapt and play something else, devs would start caring more about your favorite role. During ARR no one would play tanks. That's when they started adding mounts for tank achievements, adding mechanics for the off tank in trials and supressing one tank on team comp when it was not needed (crystal tower).

---

I believe the problem is as Sebazy said that they don't care where the tanks and healers come from as long as they exist.
To a businessman, there is no difference between having a stable, dedicated playerbase of a role and an everchanging one where people get replaced at the same speed they quit.

They stripped away as much role-specific responsibility from tanks and healers alike as possible so anyone, including people who aren't really interested in the role, can just do it.
And this approach currently works... somewhat. The numbers are still fine, healers and tanks exist, although healers had some drops on numbers (not as informed about tanks). But it's not terribly skewed towards dps so it must be fine - except that alienating veterans by telling them to fuck off so little Timmy can enjoy his fast queue times isn't a good look.

Making something accessible is good, deleting as much extra responsibility until you become borderline obsolete isn't.

And that is also why "just play dps" isn't the solution.
Neither for sending a message nor for giving the unsatisfied healer mains what they want.
It doesn't send a message because SE accounted for that by instead focussing on just always getting enough fresh meat to wear out.
It doesn't give the people who are unhappy what they want because while dps gameplay is generally more engaging instead of mashing your one button to death unless you have a clownfiesta party, it still lacks what these people really enjoy about the role: noticable and real extra responsibility, juggling different tasks, making meaninful choices, being able to show good reaction with triage healing.

I had switched from healer to BLM for the 1st EW tier.
And I love BLM. I really do and it is the one class I will miss.
It has a high skill ceiling, it's extremely rewarding to pull it off well, it requires equal amounts of planning for mobility and reaction to procs and MP ticks, it has very meaningful choices via Transpose lines/ doing short AF phases and optimizing UI phase, taught me how to keep my movement minimal but precise and even my Addle had to be planned more carefully because of the limited amount of instants to weave it properly.
It was fun, no doubt.
But it also lacked what I really want and that is the extra responsibility of keeping the party alive, of supporting the team as a whole, of juggling different tasks (as opposed all of them being focused on moar deeps), coordinating with my co heal and the party as a whole and feeling like I approach the same problem from different angles whenever I switch class.

It is why I'm so happy with playing healers in WoW again.
I've spent 40% at most dpsing in LFR which is basically normal raids and easiest difficulty but with slightly more chaos and carnage and I mean that in a good way :p
And I have a lot of room for improvement as if there's almost no end to what I can polish. Not just in the downtime gameplay department but also healing itself.
When I switch from Druid to Priest to Evoker to Paladin etc. I always have a completely different approach and a fresh challenge. Even the downtime gameplay is different between healers. Some go into melee combat, some stay at range and some downtime gameplay plays directly into getting resources for healing. They have different utility and ways to support their party.

That is what I'm looking for and playing a DPS in FFXIV isn't going to give it to me. Despite the frequent assumption that I "secretly just want to play DPS".
No, I don't. End of story.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Renathras

I don't think that's a good response, though. Yeah, one might be jaded, but that doesn't give one the right to abuse and berate other people. Being upset isn't a shield to act with impunity.

---

Doesn't have to be good, it's just the way it is. And for better or worse, unlike putting people on blast over their DPS in game, it doesn't get one banned. Thus here we are.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Renathras

Reading a LOT of replies from other people here, that isn't true. A lot of the jaded Healers here want to DPS and will actively attack anyone suggesting more healing. I'm not saying everyone, but there are some that is a fitting descriptor for. Several people have even said they've swapped to playing a DPS Job and prefer it.

---

Your old dislike towards raiders is showing and you're making sweeping generalisations again.

Making downtime gameplay between that aoe every few minutes is the path of least resistance. It's the easiest way to fix the problem and make our gameplay less boring without curb stomping players who can't handle the resource management and APM required to keep up with high levels of incoming damage and triage.

I'd absolutely love healing to be like the frontline of large scale WoW PVP back in the day where I literally have 10 versions of the same heal hot keyed for max efficiency and spend an hour each day before PvP farming NDBs/Tubers to sustain keeping 10+ people alive with frequently double the number of people wailing on them. No AoE heals, just relentless triage and pressure.

I also know that will never happen in this game. I call you out over this repeatedly because you refuse to see the simple problem with this.

Again I state:

It doesn't matter if little Timmy healer fails at DPSing in current content. No one will care. I can upload a log of a BLM (Actually THM, they didn't even have a job stone equipped) literally doing ~30 dps if you want? Nothing was said because it's not worth risking a temp ban for.

It does matter if little Timmy healer fails at Healing in content with sufficient healing requirements to actually tax our kits because people will die. It's all too common to see healers in 24 man that struggle even with that, what do you think is going to happen when one of those healers has to deal with more damage by themselves and likely without someone else to raise them to boot.

In dungeons you'll sometimes bump into healers that get so flustered and panicked by something going wrong that they will drop their active rate to 0 for back to back GCDs. If the game is throwing actual damage at them, that's not going to be a good time and these 'pls delet rescue' threads will quickly be replaced with 'pls delet damage' ones because for whatever reason, people get really angry at dying in this game even with barely any death penalty ;)

And punish people that are actually learning to play and make guenine mistakes.

I think the point Renathras is getting at is we shouldn't be so snippy at every DPS for every mistake. I get the jadedness since some of the DPS are narcissistic but we should be careful not to become one too. We also need to let go of our hatred and stop making excuses after we have been rude to the good DPS. If they are deserving of respect (by default, that should temporarily be yes when you first meet them), apologize if the Rescue just didn't work they way we wanted it too. Make sure to communicate why if they still don't know what you saved them from.

As for suggestions for what I think could work for more damage buttons, I could make WHM an example. For starters, give us back Heavensward Aero 3, so we have an AoE DoT. If it needs a rename, that's okay. I also know the lily system is designed to make the old "Cure 2" and "Medica" casts DPS neutral with the Afflatus named spells, but we could still expand upon that. There are still times we could potentially sit on wasted lilies because nobody needs the heals yet. Basically add 2 lily spells that do single target and AoE damage. This could give us a chance to incorporate a Boulder Toss or Tidal Wave or Whirlpool spell. This might complete the WHM since we are now using Afflatus Misery more often as it is intended for easy content. This does have a danger of new players using up the lilies when they could have used it for healing, but I predict this to still be fine. We have Asylum, Thin Air with Medica 2, and Temperance wings to buff the healing spells. Assize is also there and can sometimes be planned to heal the party after an AoE hit too. As for suggestions to merge Cure 2 with Afflatus Solace and Medica with Afflatus Rapture, I think those are still good ideas. There is almost never a time you want to use the casted mana version over the instant free version. Once we are out of lilies, they revert back to Cure 2 and Medica respectively.

AST is probably in better shape since they revolve around the card buffs. Probably the best suggestions for them is an AoE DoT as well as a Royal Road cooldown return that could randomly extend the card buff or grant an AoE buff version to off targets. The redraw mechanic could be worked with Royal Road perhaps if we really need to guarantee which one?

SCH probably wants the DoT systems that were dropped from SMN. 2 - 3 DoTs with Tri-Disaster for instant placement and Bane as a possibility to spread them. The old Heavensward Shadow Flare is the frequent request for their AoE cooldown.

SGE is also in a pretty good spot. Probably the best I could suggest is a couple single target and AoE spells that use the Addergall resource. Similar reasons with WHM on their lily heals not being needed yet for low damage periods. An AoE DoT couldn't hurt as well although shielding the tank and using the broken shields on Toxicon is still pretty decent for AoE.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sebazy

Your old dislike towards raiders is showing and you're making sweeping generalisations again.

---

Very strange, considering I have no dislike of raiders to show.

Not to mention...did I even MENTION raiders in that statement? It seems I did not...

Ahem.

I do like your general posts, but please...don't do that.

I have no dislike towards raiders and never have. My only issue with raiding communities at all is when they think changes should be made to cater to their needs and ignore how they will affect anyone else. Besides which, I'm technically a raider, though definitely on the low end of the field (largely by choice)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sebazy

Making downtime gameplay between that aoe every few minutes is the path of least resistance. It's the easiest way to fix the problem

---

So I've heard...which doesn't change at all the truth of what I said. The Devs have already indicated by their actions (going in the exact opposite direction) they don't want to do that. We've seen them increase healing requirements more than we've seen them increase Healer DPS complexity, so it's odd to me the insistence that the former they'll never do (when they've already done it) and the latter they'll do (when they've moved the exact opposite direction of it)

Though I am wondering if this is a netcode issue more than anything. The delays make (high pressure) triage less doable.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sebazy

I call you out over this repeatedly because you refuse to see the simple problem with this.

---

No, I disagree with your analysis and appraisal of the Devs intentions and actions.

I think the issue is more the insistence that even casual content needs to have Savage level of healing checks to be "fun" or "engaging".

/sigh

That's probably some hyperbole, so let me be fair: That it needs to be significant enough that a beginner Healer using GCDs exclusively to heal it will be unable to do so or feel like they cannot do so. Savage level healing right now CAN (arguably, the first bosses, anyway) be done that way, as can Extremes. It's dumb to, but you COULD heal Extremes just using GCD heals (provided you can get the casts off) if you wanted to. No one does it because it's a bad idea and you'd probably fail the Enrages if your party isn't very good.

But when it comes to 4 mans, this is how people healed in ARR and HW (and led to the Cleric Stance schism). It was entirely possible and wasn't too high pressure or impossible to do. If you WEREN'T trying to juggle damage alongside it, it was entirely possible to heal anything with GCDs.

So if casual dungeons/trials were made where they had MORE CONSISTENT damage which necessitated MORE OFTEN heals, but the healing was well within comfortable GCD healing capability, this wouldn't "scare off" new Healers or be impossible for "Little Timmy" resulting in him being flamed and leaving the game. That's hyperbole and not at all what would be the result.

.

But none of this actually counters my point: If people "just want to heal", then they're making all the wrong arguments. And as I said, "Sylphie" wouldn't be an insult here if that were truly the case.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CNitsah

And punish people that are actually learning to play and make guenine mistakes.

---

I'm a bit confused. Are we talking about increasing the healing requirements in P9S, TOP, or Sashtasha normal?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tigore

I think the point Renathras is getting at is we shouldn't be so snippy at every DPS for every mistake.

---

Among other things, but yes.

My one issue with your Lily damage spender is that it creates the Energy Drain situation. One of the most common complaints in both the long form survey and Ty's survey of SCH is players feeling penalized for using Sacred Soil, Indom, or Excogitation because they "felt" wrong doing it since they "knew" they "should" be using Energy Drain instead. It's also one of the most common praises for SGE as being "a better SCH" that it doesn't have its damage abilities fighting its healing abilities over resources.

It's one of those things that sounds good on paper until people feel bad for using Solace/Rapture because "Well, I could be doing more damage..." Granted, it might not be AS big a problem because WHM doesn't have Lily spenders like Soil or Excog that are really nice abilities and a lot of Healers find them enjoyable to use (Healers who actually enjoy healing and neat healing abilities instead of optimizing for damage), but they feel like they're playing wrong to do it. So it makes it less fun for players since they have a choice of doing the "correct" but less fun Energy Drain or doing the "wrong" but thing they want to actually do AF healing spenders.

I feel like the better answer would be to give WHM a mitigation, regen, or barrier Lily spender instead. Something that will always be useful even if people are at full health - putting a regen or barrier on the main Tank is always going to do you at least some good, and a lesser individual or party mitigation can be used intelligently to be effective even when damage is low or only on a Tank.

And I HIGHLY disagree to Cure 2/Solace Medica/Rapture being merged that way. As I've said before, there are times I use the hardcast version because I'm about to need more healing while also needing movement. Since I have the option, I can use the cast version first and save the instant for movement. This is intelligent use of abilities being rewarded. But if they're merged, the player is robbed of this agency and choice. Now, there IS a solution, and it would be to treat Lilies like Umbral Hearts on BLM (I think I said this in the survey Ty posted in general, but I'll repeat it here). Like how BLM can cast Flare with or without Umbral Hearts, but doing it with an Umbral Heart consumes the heart and cuts Flare's MP cost by 1/3rd, I feel like WHM could use that here. Basically, when you unlock Solace/Rapture, you get a trait that makes Cure 2/Medica (respectively) instant cast but still have their MP cost. The MP cost is negated when a Lily is active, consuming the Lily and generating 1/3rd Blood Lily.

While this takes away a bit of the nuance of choosing a hardcast to save an instant for movement, if it's always instant, then that isn't relevant and the player isn't punished even as they lose the choice and skill expression (vs being punished if Lily consumption isn't a choice). This would also make WHM a bit more mobile, which isn't a bad thing since that has also often been requested.

Another alternative would be to just have a "Afflatus" ability like SGE's Eukrsia. That way you could use it as a modifier and retain ALL the utility. Activating it would have a 1.0 sec GCD, make Media into Affltus Rapture, Cure 2 into Afflatus Solace, and maybe Holy into Afflatus Misery (if Blood Lily is fully nourished) if we want to get some extra mileage out of the ability. This would also allow Afflatus versions of Regen or Medica 2 to be added in the future, all for the price of a single button. I'm not sure I'm a fan of this one, but it WOULD get rid of the stupid button bloat. Diagnosis and Prognosis on SGE don't feel like wasted button spaces because you actually USE THEM with Eukrasia (even if you'd use them MORE if Toxicon was damage neutral...but you still wouldn't spam them even then because it would be MP inefficient vs Dosis casts)

So having a Trait at 30 to upgrade Cure 1 into Cure 2 (lowering Cure 2's MP cost to 500 and cast time to 1.5 sec), and then at 52 Trait to make Cure 2 instant cast and make it cost no MP when you have a Lily, Trait at 76 to do the same thing with Medica 1 to make it instant cast and have 0 MP cost when you have a Lily. That would allow Solace/Rapture to be removed that way (like Fell Cleave, it would have the alternate form/animation when the Lily was used to give a bit more visual spice). I'm not instantly a fan of the Eukrasia toggle, but if that WAS added to WHM, you'd have Cure 2 (Solace) and Medica (Rapture) pulling double duty for hotbar efficiency right off the bat, with some potential Afflatus versions of Regen, Medica 2, and Cure 3 in the future, if desired, as well as getting some single-target use out of the Holy button. Honestly, a WHM Eukrasia would free up several potential hotbar spaces for button additions (like Aero 3) and allow the Job to have a future avenue of growth down that line...though it might feel too samey to some people with SGE (kinda silly since SGE doesn't actually use the button THAT much considering it tries to avoid GCD heals...)

I am fine with Aero 3 being readded, though. Long as it's not a damage gain over Glare for single target, it won't change anything much other than giving an extra button to push before arriving at the second pack (Dia while running with the Tank, Swiftcast Aero 3 on the full group, Presence of Mind, Holyspam), so that's no big deal there. And I STILL want Water as a level 15 AOE (Holy without the stun) that upgrades to Holy at level 45.

.

AST I won't speak to since I really hate playing AST and honestly don't care what they do with it as long as it makes some AST players happier (contrary to some belief, I do want people to be happy and enjoy the game. :D)

SCH I've kind of given up on. I love SCH as it exists now, but if the masses want the awful SB DoT mage (awful to me - I did not enjoy it then, even though I did play it when the other party Healer only had WHM leveled), then so be it. I'll just drop it and leave it to them.

Agree that SGE is in a good spot. My biggest issues with it are that Toxicon feels bad to use because it isn't damage neutral using it with GCD shields, which also makes GCD shields feel bad to use. Making Toxicon damage neutral would fix that problem. Adding a Eukrasian Dyskrasia (as silly as that sounds if you know the definitions of those prefixes) to be an AOE DoT would be fine as long as, again, it's not a damage gain over Dosis in single target. I HIGHLY disagree with Addersgall spenders for damage - again, this is the thing people love about SGE and hate about SCH in all the responses that talked about the two. I didn't see a single long-form or Ty survey result for SGE asking for Addersgall damage spenders. Addersgall largely DOESN'T have that issue (unlike Lilies) because it DOES have "useful spending" even when no immediate haling is needed thanks to Taurochole and Kerachole having decent durations and almost always doing something useful for the party. Highly highly HIGHLY disagree with Addersgall spenders. Especially when Addersting exists right there.

One solution might be to allow them to be converted (e.g. Eukrasia Toxicon consuming Addersgall instead), but I feel like that's still the same thing and a bad idea. Not to mention might cause technical problems with using the ability (e.g. you have one Addersting up and no Addersgall, hitting Eukrasia wouldn't allow you to cast Toxicon at all until you consume the Eukrasia on something else). Maybe if there was a shortish CD (40 or 60 sec or something) that converted an Addersgall into an Addersting, as this would still allow people to use them on healing abilities without feeling bad while allowing unused ones to be converted...though I still think that's too close to the same problem.

I honestly feel like SGE is in a great place right now and Toxicon being damage neutral is the only big change. Maybe have Rhizomata generate both 1 Addersgall and 1 Addersting could be nice as well. And another often asked for change is making some kind of party healing with Kardia. A lot of people think having Zoe, Krasis, and Soteria are kind of redundant, so having one do something like make Kardia radiate a 20y radius heal from the SGE (like casting Prognosis, just without you being a bad) would be useful. Honestly, SGE has too much oGCD healing as it is, but using Kardia for that would be intelligent and actually make SGE more what it should be. Personally I'd also prefer a 1-2-3 damage rotation than a DoT-1-1-1-..., but that's probably just me. For some reason people love stupid DoTs (I hate DoTs) better than rotations, so it's whatever.

SGE can stay the same, just make Soteria or Krasis have the effect of an AOE Kardia instead, make Toxicon damage neutral, and make Rhizomata generate an Addersting in addition to an Adderstgall.

Edit: OH! Almost forgot - and make Plegma 20y or 25y range. Many of the complaints about SGE were over that, with most people describing it as "weird", "strange", or "annoying". I didn't see a lot of people really LIKE it being a near-melee range ability. I actually didn't see any, though I may have missed someone praising it in there somewhere. I know some people will say it's a gigabrain skill expression having 6y, but just no. That's like the people insisting Continuation on GNB needed to be hyper-melee and not have the 3y range on it. It just is discongruous with the rest of the kit for no good reason other than just to be so. :ENDEDIT

https://i.imgur.com/WM5rNjy.jpg

There are several ways we could approach modifying the healer kits. I was putting together some quick solutions that could be passed along for a survey. The goal I was going at was working with the current systems we have and adding to them. Our toolbars are getting full, so we need to be mindful of that too. Merging 2 buttons doing similar things is a method to free up a button slot. The thought of lilies having a DPS option did occur to me on some thoughts that always feels like the best option since killing the enemy faster with more DPS has most often been the best utility. At that point, we may have to have a vote if the players are alright sitting on Lilies / Addersgall or if they wish to have a way to use them differently when no healing is needed. Another avenue to explore is that all the healers are ranged at this point. If we look to Warcraft, we have a few potential melee healers there with Paladin, Druid and Monk. Having a combo system for one healer could be interesting and the healer tends to need to hover close to that melee range anyway so their 30 yard centered AoE heals get everyone.

As for the AST class you didn't comment much on, I usually see players complain they want the old cards back. We kind of don't have TP anymore though, so "The Spire" would need something new like a movement speed boost if we go down that avenue. Maybe even some way to allow casting while moving too. At the very least, I would like to see Royal Road come back to some capacity, so we can get those AoE card buffs or maybe an extended version on our selfish DPS bursting the hell out of an enemy.

An additional thing I would like on SCH would be a fix on Dissipation. For the most part, it just feels like an extra Aetherflow cooldown with restrictions on a 3 minute cooldown. That one players suggested that the increase in healing magic potency to be extended to all oGCD ones too rather than just Adloquium and Succor only ... well Physick too, but that one rarely gets used being the "cure" spell for SCH. Why on Etheirys does it not buff oGCDs when it grants you 3 Aether for oGCD heals? Also having the fairy still being there with us will help a lot too.

The AoE Kardia effect from Soteria and Rhizomata granting both 1 Addersgall and Addersting I agree with. I do use the latter cooldown since Taurochole and Kerachole are important for damage reduction on the tank. The DPS sometimes need that Druochole for mistakes that have occurred after all. The first Soteria cooldown does not feel very impactful though and it would have been a much better choice to use Haima or Panhaima on the tank.

WHM I think does have a robust kit that is simple with its effectiveness. Being able to spam stun enemies is really strong and works very well paired with Regen, Medica 2 and / or Asylum. Most cases, I notice the players wanting to be able to use the Stone, Water and Air elements. We kind of drifted away from that with having Dia and Glare creating a light only damage healer.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Renathras

So I've heard...which doesn't change at all the truth of what I said. The Devs have already indicated by their actions (going in the exact opposite direction) they don't want to do that. We've seen them increase healing requirements more than we've seen them increase Healer DPS complexity, so it's odd to me the insistence that the former they'll never do (when they've already done it) and the latter they'll do (when they've moved the exact opposite direction of it)

Though I am wondering if this is a netcode issue more than anything. The delays make (high pressure) triage less doable.

---

In Savage sure. In extreme? Eh not really, it's not that BarbEX and RubiEX hit especially hard, more that the first two primals just deal minimal damage which is a trend in itself.

I don't think it's fair to pin their hesitance on net code and latency worries given how tight some mechanics have historically been for timing such as Throttle.

Quote:

---

No, I disagree with your analysis and appraisal of the Devs intentions and actions.

I think the issue is more the insistence that even casual content needs to have Savage level of healing checks to be "fun" or "engaging".

/sigh

That's probably some hyperbole, so let me be fair: That it needs to be significant enough that a beginner Healer using GCDs exclusively to heal it will be unable to do so or feel like they cannot do so. Savage level healing right now CAN (arguably, the first bosses, anyway) be done that way, as can Extremes. It's dumb to, but you COULD heal Extremes just using GCD heals (provided you can get the casts off) if you wanted to. No one does it because it's a bad idea and you'd probably fail the Enrages if your party isn't very good.

---

And yet I literally dropped math explaining why I worked to the numbers I did, your numbers BTW. Our healing kits are overblown to the extent where it takes savage levels of incoming damage to actually pressure us into really wanting to learn how to use them. You can easily heal Extremes with GCD heals no problem at all (save swiftcast for knuckle drum since I know that's what you're referring to) and no, it's not going to push you into enrage. People dieing will push you into enrage. You realise Rubicante has an enrage that's like 11 minutes right? Without deaths an average PF group is killing in in ~9 minutes.

Quote:

---

But when it comes to 4 mans, this is how people healed in ARR and HW (and led to the Cleric Stance schism). It was entirely possible and wasn't too high pressure or impossible to do. If you WEREN'T trying to juggle damage alongside it, it was entirely possible to heal anything with GCDs.

So if casual dungeons/trials were made where they had MORE CONSISTENT damage which necessitated MORE OFTEN heals, but the healing was well within comfortable GCD healing capability, this wouldn't "scare off" new Healers or be impossible for "Little Timmy" resulting in him being flamed and leaving the game. That's hyperbole and not at all what would be the result.

---

Uh, there were three factors that made dungeons different to what they are now:

Gating or a lack of, you weren't always hard limited to 2 packs of mobs pre pull.

Cleric Stance spicing things up

Not only did you have far less oGCD healing capability back then, but you also had to contend with your heals having a cast time across the board.

ARR dungeons weren't more involving because of additional damage, they were involving because doing damage carried multiple elements of risk that all added to compound each other. Now correct me if I'm wrong, but if there's one thing even less likely to appear in the game than a comprehensive healer DPS kit rethink or a noticeable increase in healing requirements for casual content, it's the return of cleric stance and the removal of swathes of our insta cast and oGCD healing. Fair? So with that in mind, how else do you propose to make 4 man dungeons more engaging? Set pre nerf Pharos Sirus as the baseline and unleash the Sudos of war?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sebazy

ARR dungeons weren't more involving because of additional damage, they were involving because doing damage carried multiple elements of risk that all added to compound each other. Now correct me if I'm wrong, but if there's one thing even less likely to appear in the game than a comprehensive healer DPS kit rethink or a noticeable increase in healing requirements for casual content, it's the return of cleric stance and the removal of swathes of our insta cast and oGCD healing. Fair? So with that in mind, how else do you propose to make 4 man dungeons more engaging? Set pre nerf Pharos Sirus as the baseline and unleash the Sudos of war?

---

Only if we can bring back pre-nerf Amdapor Keep, with the bees that were so hard for people to manage to kill fast enough they'd use limit break on them

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sebazy

Gating or a lack of, you weren't always hard limited to 2 packs of mobs pre pull.

---

Which has been caused by a side issue: Lack of damage from mobs.

If mobs would deal significantly more damage, it can deter a tank from pulling more, knowing that if he does it anyway, its a wipe. Sure, with proper coordination, then tank and healer might still find ways to w2w. But the moment this isnt default, it shows a lot better balance. And this is why having more packs is welcome: it makes the pulling part less static (as many tanks by default will pull 2 packs). Just imagine 5 packs where the 3rd and 4th are very hard hitting. The tank can decide to go for many patterns (1+2,3+4,5 or 1+2+3,4+5 or 1+2,3,4+5), and this freedom also creates variety. But this only works if the enemies do enough damage. Otherwise even if its 5 packs, they will all still be pulled at once. And if this works, gating isnt needed because the gating is already applied by the risk of wipes.

Honestly for the people who say Sage is fine and that toxikon should be damage neutral

-Sage is the "dps" healer yet its rotation is the same as the other 3 spamming one button for almost every gcd, there is no diferentiation and that is far below what should be considered acceptable when games with healers that barely deal damage have more involved rotations, that is not "fine".

-Damage neutral toxikon (by damage increase) with the current healer design is a bad idea. Currently the only skill ceiling Sage has is how little gcd's they use to heal and how they move, this encourages being knowledgeable about their cds and the extent they can use it, an increase to toxikon damage would remove the job from that little ceiling as it woudn't matter what they do (gcd or cooldown planning) all would be neutral and wouldn't encourage job or fight knowledge and this without going into how it would impact its aoe cause it would make dyskrasia obsolete unless this action is buffed too and that would lead to an adjustment of every healer aoe capabilities.

-Increase on Phlegma range is a semi bad idea, range is usually big enough for most boss arenas but the shorter range plays a bigger role than it seems, Sage lacks any disjointed heal so in order to heal effectively it needs to be closer to the boss, phlegma acts as a way to lure sages into that optimal healing range and also as a guide to know how far some party members may be (If party member is 2xphlegma range or closer they'll get healed)

-Its healing kit needs differentiation and not being basically selfish Sch2.0 but slightly better for multihits and worse for big hits

The job is far from fine, as it is right now is one of the most soulless jobs this game ever released