Good. That'll offset the people spamming perfect scores with such insightful reviews as "Not great, but still good" and "I liked it" and "people are dumb for giving it a low score so I'm giving it a 10".
Goes both ways.
Printable View
There are still people take Metacritic seriously? Huh. Wonders never cease, eh?
C-cabal? Why would you insinuate others are in a cult? It certainly threatens the credibility of what you say, if nothing else it'd tick people off enough that they'd just not listen to what you say regardless of the contents of one's speech.
I don't agree. Reviews are a subjective experience. If YOU don't engage with that content, it shouldn't affect your score. If someone is a cutscene skipper and really enjoys the next battle content, I wouldn't blame them for giving Dawntrail a great score. You wouldn't ask them to rate the story, and their review would still be valid as it gives insight into other aspects of the game.
Dawntrail has flaws but it is not a 6.9... this is why I can't take user scores seriously, too often hijacked by bandwagons and trolls
I remember when Breath of the Wild had a low 7 when it came out for user score
Typically in reviews the reviewer is expected to play through the game in order to give a review. If I skipped all the cut scenes but only reviewed the end game content that wouldn't be a fair review either. I'm not saying they have to go out and clear an ultimate to judge the expansion, but at least expecting people to see the normal raids is fair. Even the most casual player will likely be doing the first normal raids.