And the rest implied that whoever doesn't like the state of things simply didn't learn how to play, which is an indirect ad hominem towards anyone for whom that condition is true. Something you do again when you say:"PvP in this game is actually quite fun for those that take the time to learn it.".
To put the sentence in logical terms:"If you put the time to learn how to play, then PvP is fun."
Formalized: A=>B, or from A follows B.
Now, the table for a logical implication looks like this:
A - B - A=>B
T - T - T
T - F - F
F - T - T
F - F - T
(F standing for false and T for true respectively)
If the implication is true, then not having fun and having learned it isn't possible, because in that case the implication is false. If the first part of the implication is false, the rest doesn't matter, the implication is always true (Logic is fun like that!). The only case where you can not have fun and the implication is true is when you didn't take the time to learn it (False, False). This leads to the logical conclusion above, an indirect ad hominem that people who don't like the status quo need to git gut.
Now, to take up my own advice, I'll put it in spoilers to not take up too much space.
That aside: I'm still curious what "We" know about me and my gaming habits. You unfortunately didn't quite answer that and only alleged I took offense.