Should goblins be aggressive?

I think it should depend on setting. Goblins are always ambiguous with their loyalties. I have no problem with regular trader goblins (the only kind we have now) being passive. It's the armored fishbot killers that I want wiping everything out on sight... and if they aggro in their homeland when we invade, all the better.

What I care about is...

Who's their primal!? Based on their love of jinglyshine, I nominate Scrooge McDuck.

http://duckman.pettho.com/characters/scrooge.jpg
♪ Life is like a hurricane ♪
♫ here in ♫
♪ Duckburg ♪

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by PSxpert2011

This. Reason why SE shouldn't take any more community suggestions. Also, you worry about weaver and let the big fighters worry about what should be aggressive.

---

What does that even mean?

Yes they should be aggressive, as well as all other beastmen. Would be nice to actually have some sense of danger in this game.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Theplatter

Yes they should be aggressive, as well as all other beastmen. Would be nice to actually have some sense of danger in this game.

---

We do. Rush into Zahar'ak, Natalan and U'Ghamaro Mines to get your sense of danger. Get the exploration achievement if you want a sense of danger. I find it refreshing not all beastmen all OMIGODDIE! I see high level goblins and sigh in relief that they're one of the only things in the surrounding area not trying to kill me.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pooky

I'd love if Dalamud does something to the goblins in ARR that make them creatures to be feared and hated again.

---

you sir are a goblinist.