Originally Posted by
Batbrat
None of that is sexual. "Yes it is, because I know-" You provided that context to yourself, on your own.
Remember back in the early 90s, when a lot of us as kids were dancing to the Thong Song? Candy Shop, Give it To You, Promiscuous, Dip it Low-I can go on and on. We had no idea what those lyrics meant, we just knew we liked the song. Not everyone is going to hear the lyrics and go like BOYYOIYOIYOING most people it'll go right over their heads, if they even have the game music on to begin with. But yeah, so the main issue here is line by line, nothing is explicit, and that's the difference. It wasn't as descriptively raunchy as WAP. Most of that, you can say in public chats just fine-I don't know why one would...? I don't know if we're asking for the right to be addicts in shout chat, I'm hoping we're not. Explicit chat isnt bannable at all though, so long as it's between consenting people privately. If the song was explicit then I would agree, but since it's subtle, it doesn't compare. "that's not subtle-" Yes it is, in the sense that blatant vulgarity isn't in use. There is no private part naming, no cursing, no direct mention of sex. That's not to say that it isnt about sex, but since it's ambiguous about it, then there's nothing wrong with it, even if you yourself can figure out what you believe it to mean.