6.28 Patch Notes

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hagare

so to you a literal case of bring the class is a permissible gap.
A case where one class is replaced by another because it can't clear is a permissible gap?
https://media.tenor.com/q9crr_x6HLYA...-that-word.gif

---

Look at the little troll, trying to infer. Proper balance would only have permissible gaps. The GNB over WAR one was not an example of a permissible gap. Do you get it yet bluelet SMN?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hagare

so to you a literal case of bring the class is a permissible gap.
A case where one class is replaced by another because it can't clear is a permissible gap?
https://media.tenor.com/q9crr_x6HLYA...-that-word.gif

---

A permissible gap would be the slight difference of 1-2% inside of a role.

Not sure where this argument started but the state Warrior was in compared to Gunbreaker was not a 'Permissible gap' it was downright unbalanced and the community let the devs know.

All jobs withing a Role should perform within 1-2% of eachother, there is no 'Skill Job does more DPS' because that just makes things harder to balance.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FireMage

Look at the little troll, trying to infer. Proper balance would only have permissible gaps. The GNB over WAR one was not an example of a permissible gap. Do you get it yet bluelet SMN?

---

so what you're saying by that is, that WAR SHOULD be buffed despite their ease of play.
Because The GNB over WAR one was not an example of a permissible gap.
That just because it's easy to play, doesn't mean it shouldn't be viable.

again, thank you for contradicting yourself.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FireMage

This is what we in the know refer to as a non point. It doesn't matter if anyone asked for it or not, what matters is what IS. Ease of play MUST affect Job balance, otherwise you are penalizing skill

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rein_eon_Osborne

Other than that... oh yeah. They're making some pieces dyeable. I hope this will extend to other undyeable pieces like those pieces from ARR, HW, and StB Alliance Raids, Woad set, Valkyrie set, Plague Doctor, Arhat, etc etc... you name it!

---

All of the now dyeable pieces already had crafted color variants that were dyeable, so I assume they were chosen mostly because it was easier then giving a completely new set that treatment.

I think I'd probably want to see the Arhat pieces dyeable the most out of the mentioned, though.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hagare

daw. Now who's making stuff up.
PS: SMN got buffed. The easy job.

---

Not making up anything. And it shouldn't have been

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FireMage

Not making up anything. And it shouldn't have been

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FireMage

The fact you have trouble with SMN is making a lot of sense

---

not making up anything indeed.
see ya later verfiremagician

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hagare

not making up anything indeed.
see ya later verfiremagician

---

I mean you being a bluelet shows you have trouble with the easiest DPS

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hagare

so to you a literal case of bring the class is a permissible gap.
A case where one class is replaced by another because it can\\'t clear is a permissible gap?
https://media.tenor.com/q9crr_x6HLYA...-that-word.gif

---

This guy has literally been poisoning the dps forums because he's a 1 trick rdm player and he's prolly mad smn got a similar buff to rdm.

They buff Warrior.
Me happy.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hagare

not making up anything indeed.
see ya later verfiremagician

---

The fact that you are calling him by usernames from another website means you know how he behaves on that website. Stop letting him do it here as well.