but how epic would it be if they did transfer the data via a series of tubes? I vote they take the steam punk option. Screw digital transfer, screw moving the servers, use an analog version of the interwebs!
Printable View
but how epic would it be if they did transfer the data via a series of tubes? I vote they take the steam punk option. Screw digital transfer, screw moving the servers, use an analog version of the interwebs!
Eh? I said i assume that they wont move it, since they didnt say a word on it. I just made clear that thinking they would move it in first place is also assuming things.
Moving digital Data can be expensive as moving the Hardware itself or even more expensive. That depends on different factors.. you should know, since you are a programmer. Thinking that moving digital data is always cheap is straight wrong.
Existing people will get access to it, at least via World Transfer. World Transer = Money income for the Company btw.
1. i am not angry, why would i?
2. i said i am assuming that they dont move it.
3. what is your point?
Correct.
Where did i ever complain about something? I were just pointing out, like i stated above, that the whole Topic is just assuming that the Servers would move. It is possible, i never said it is not.
I would actually go so far as to say the current servers are not going anywhere simply based on the fact that the servers are staying up after the final save (based on the results of the player poll) as Yoshi stated in one of the recent letters. So it's very reasonable to assume that since they are transferring the data anyway, that they probably will transfer certain worlds to the new data centers.
You've got to think about it logically. There is absolutely no reason to keep all of the current worlds in Japan, while there are plenty of good reasons not to. That coupled with the fact that they are already transferring the data to new servers. Moving the data across the room or across the world is hardly different from a technological standpoint.
I am sorry but you made it very clear you were not assuming in your first post, to even say people are lazy to not research:
You seemed very confident to know about what is going on.
No, moving the data will never be more expensive as moving the Data + Hardware because it is just that, its cost of moving data plus the cost of moving the hardware, Even if moving the data is more costly than hardware, you always need that data, you cant just move the hardware alone in this situation because you need that data. So it is always going to be cheaper to just send the data. Which they wouldn't do because they would not ship over hardware they can already get on that server.
Molly, I understand what you mean by your statement about servers staying up but it is still irrelevant i think, simply due to the fact that the data we will be using from nov1st onwards is not the data we will be using in ARR, that data is not being transferred. ONLY the data that is saved in 1 hour is being moved. Weather the game stays up for another 2 months or not means nothing because the data for those 2 months is separate.
They are spending this 2 hours to create a copy of the current data at that point. That is the whole point of this "your data will not update after nov 1st" because they have it already from that point.
They do a copy, not a cut.
You can be happily playing on US server now with your character but when ARR comes in couple months, your data that was saved today may have gone through those futuristic space tubes to US or EU :P
The costs of putting a new "box" in a different region are minimal. The monthly costs to maintain it are probably a lot more.
As for what servers should go where. Simple all the servers with MY accounts on em, go to NA. Except Sargantas, that server can get tossed in the ocean as far as I'm concerned.
Sort of, It was meant to illustrate that the 1.0 servers are not the 2.0 servers. I doubt they'd have ARR running on a VM, or vice versa, 1.0 running on a VM so that the world would stay on the same physical machines. I suppose there was probably a more eloquent way to state it.