Same problem, new request

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jojoya

That is up to the developers.

The developers that would work on adding the suggestion as a feature would most likely be the same ones that added the ability to hide players under certain circumstances. It's unlikely they have anything to do if a decision to add more wards is made other than install existing code once others set up the additional server hardware. It's hard to say how much work is involved with increasing item limits but that is already work in progress so wouldn't conflict with a new suggestion where the work won't be done until already scheduled/in progress projects are completed. Perhaps they had a hand in coding the lottery but that work is long since completed.

There is no harm in the suggestion being made. It's not like SE is going to do it if they feel what potential benefit there might be is outweighed by other concerns.

---

This entire thread has nothing benefiting the community but just a change on tone and narration, as per his previous miniature HoH attempt
You post this picture yourself:

https://img2.finalfantasyxiv.com/acc...9ac4c4d55d.png

Even yourself agreed the request do not makes sense since his plot location do not have direct view to the light house
Also, asking a feature to tune off other people's decoration when main selling point of housing ward is the "neighborhood"
I am pretty sure they ain't going to do it as they haven't give up to the request to disable other people's glamour

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Impia

Once again I would like to point out that doing this is equivalent to asking to be able to hide other player's glam choices because you don't like them. Does that really sound like a reasonable choice here? I for one work hard on my decorations, and don't really like the idea that they could just be hidden on a whim. If and when an instanced ward option were implemented, then players like AnjouMaaka would not have to concern themselves with other people's decoration choices.

---

So a few hundred players choose to hide glamours and housing decorations from their personal view while tens of thousands of other players can still see them.

Are you genuinely so devoid of attention from others that forcing those few hundred other players from seeing your work matters that much to you? Especially when you will have no idea of whether or not they have those things hidden on their end?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rinoa_353

I can agree with this when I spent several hours decorating my yards only where most people would be done with them in a matter of minutes. I love others seeing how nice my garden is and how highly decorated my homes are, for those interested seeing my homes, they are in my signature.

---

See above.

Those who care and are interested will still be seeing the work you've done.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Eraden

Mao agrees. Mao nots liking stifle other peoples freedom to express themselves. Is something abouts that whats make Mao really upset. Is almost likes trying to erase person.

---

This wouldn't stop anyone's ability to express themselves or the ability of others to see that self expression if they are interested.

When it comes to erasing people, the game has already added that feature as part of the blacklist. I don't believe that I've seen you complaining about that in General Discussion.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Divinemights

This entire thread has nothing benefiting the community but just a change on tone and narration, as per his previous miniature HoH attempt
You post this picture yourself:

https://img2.finalfantasyxiv.com/acc...9ac4c4d55d.png

Even yourself agreed the request do not makes sense since his plot location do not have direct view to the light house
Also, asking a feature to tune off other people's decoration when main selling point of housing ward is the "neighborhood"
I am pretty sure they ain't going to do it as they haven't give up to the request to disable other people's glamour

---

It's not turning off anyone's decoration. The decoration is still there for the owner and others to see. The only players affected are those that would choose to enable the feature.

Strange how people are pushing so hard against adding an option that wouldn't affect them unless they chose to use it. You would have no idea whether another player is even using it.

Are you this vocal about the players already using mods that change your appearance to them?

Are you this vocal about how players can now use the blacklist to completely erase another player from their screen?

Would you object this much to the idea if it had come from someone other than the OP, or would you simply say "I don't think it's a good idea" and leave it at that?

To me, it would just be an option for those who want it like we have so many other options in the game. I don't see myself using it. Someone else choosing to use it wouldn't affect me. The OP is not the sole player that has made the suggestion. Other players have made the same suggestion in the past.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jojoya

When it comes to erasing people, the game has already added that feature as part of the blacklist. I don't believe that I've seen you complaining about that in General Discussion.

---

Is tryings to accuse Mao of something, Jojoya? Just because Mao nots comment in General Discussion abouts blacklists erasing peoples does nots mean Mao nots uneasy abouts that either. Just means Mao nots able jump into every thread abouts this, that and other thing. For record, Mao does NOT like blacklists erasings people either. If someone so bad as to be abusive, proper thing to be done is for SE to investigate and ban if person reporteds to be abusive actually is abusive. Is more work for SE buts then protectings peoples freedoms always requires work. Blacklist should just prevent offensive person from harassing victim.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jojoya

To me, it would just be an option for those who want it like we have so many other options in the game. I don't see myself using it. Someone else choosing to use it wouldn't affect me. The OP is not the sole player that has made the suggestion. Other players have made the same suggestion in the past.

---

Your tone changed too dramatically.
I never participated in his original miniature HoH thread, isn't it?
My comment remains it is out of bound to have such feature in game, same as the request to turn off other's glamour
In matter of fact, you are the one that dug out his past
I didn't even realize it is the same person until you did that

Also, why would I mind about blacklist when it is an option that benefits the community because it is a counter measure not only resolve player vs player abuse and also solve the issue of abusive player intrusively sitting in your house to creep you out
It benefits the community.
What does this "feature" benefits other than satisfy an ill intended self proclaimed HoA?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Divinemights

Your tone changed too dramatically.
I never participated in his original miniature HoH thread, isn't it?
My comment remains it is out of bound to have such feature in game, same as the request to turn off other's glamour
In matter of fact, you are the one that dug out his past
I didn't even realize it is the same person until you did that

Also, why would I mind about blacklist when it is an option that benefits the community because it is a counter measure not only resolve player vs player abuse and also solve the issue of abusive player intrusively sitting in your house to creep you out
It benefits the community.
What does this "feature" benefits other than satisfy an ill intended self proclaimed HoA?

---

As I mentioned before in this thread, loading times for those players using older computers or PS4.

My tone is changing because most of the replies keep focusing on the OP instead of on the suggestion itself.

I also was not the first to make reference to the OP's past history in this thread.

You say it's a bad suggestion. How are you harmed by a random player choosing to hide outdoor furnishings from their personal view when in a ward?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jojoya

As I mentioned before in this thread, loading times for those players using older computers or PS4.

My tone is changing because most of the replies keep focusing on the OP instead of on the suggestion itself.

I also was not the first to make reference to the OP's past history in this thread.

You say it's a bad suggestion. How are you harmed by a random player choosing to hide outdoor furnishings from their personal view when in a ward?

---

Play a singleplayer game if you cant handle other players in an MMORPG.

You're welcome.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jojoya

As I mentioned before in this thread, loading times for those players using older computers or PS4.

My tone is changing because most of the replies keep focusing on the OP instead of on the suggestion itself.
I also was not the first to make reference to the OP's past history in this thread.
You say it's a bad suggestion. How are you harmed by a random player choosing to hide outdoor furnishings from their personal view when in a ward?

---

This does not explain your sudden change of tone when I repeatedly stating this is a a bad suggestion as this does not benefit community and waste of time and resources.
There "maybe" same type request when PS4 is still supported, but that is no longer valid any more.
PS4 is no longer supported and there is no PS4 Dawntrail license

You do not have a strong case nor meaningful arguments to makes people change the mind beside "it does not impact anyone"
He should be getting an apartment if he cares about "view", how about that?
If you stand on Shirogane apartment stable, you have exactly same view

Dawntrail is supported on the PS4 and the Dawntrail license is under a dual PS4|PS5 heading. And it has been announced during live letter that PS4 would be supported throughout Dawntrail's life cycle.

The PS4 is just a convenient scapegoat. If you hadn't that, there'd be the Xbox S at least. And given the fix for a Steamdeck exclusive issue earlier this year, the devs also appear to take that console into account to a certain degree.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jojoya

As I mentioned before in this thread, loading times for those players using older computers or PS4.

My tone is changing because most of the replies keep focusing on the OP instead of on the suggestion itself.

I also was not the first to make reference to the OP's past history in this thread.

You say it's a bad suggestion. How are you harmed by a random player choosing to hide outdoor furnishings from their personal view when in a ward?

---

The suggestion to hide all outdoor items could certainly work. The only jank I could see coming from that is items still take up physical space. So you'd hitch on items that wouldn't be rendered client side but still be there server sided.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jojoya

As I mentioned before in this thread, loading times for those players using older computers or PS4.

My tone is changing because most of the replies keep focusing on the OP instead of on the suggestion itself.

I also was not the first to make reference to the OP's past history in this thread.

You say it's a bad suggestion. How are you harmed by a random player choosing to hide outdoor furnishings from their personal view when in a ward?

---

Hiding other people's decorations, be they glam or housing, is a step over the line for me. I think the suggestion is bad, yes. I should also point out that OP was the first to drudge up the drama of the previous thread, as their very first sentence is calling out the <MEAT> FC as petty for leaving their towers up, rather than an innocent pitch for a QOL suggestion.

Quote:

---

I will have to say you are quite petty for continuing to keep the lighthouse blocked from view for 10 months now. In hindsight, you can keep it that way if you want. I don't care cause your days of doing so are numbered. What I do care about is Square Enix seeing an opportunity to fix this problem that exists for players like myself.

---

Why are you content to gloss over that, but find yourself so incensed by others for referencing the same in response?