SE: Please consider the following Greed loot condition

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Deceptus

In my humble opinion, someone who can't use an item should not be able to roll over someone who can use the item.

---

No, all this would accomplish is players feeling like they need to unlock classes/jobs and level them so they have the best chance of getting loot. Most gear drops can be traded for Grand Company seals which can be traded for very useful and commonly used items. Adding another tier of loot priority would punish newer players who might plan to play something else in the future or just want some extra seals.

Also just because you have a level 70 something doesn't mean you even play it. I know loads of players who have every combat class at 70 but stopped playing most of them when they hit max level.

Having a class at 70 =/= actually playing said class regularly.

Also if you really want something for a class, why not just do the fight as that class so you can roll need? Why isn't this an option if you want the monk weapon?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Zojha

By extension: Why would you want to deny someone a Need roll when they spent time and effort with you just because they didn't come as the job that can roll Need?

---

You aren't, because you can't have a Need roll unless someone is on that class. That is the whole point of the Need system. That's why the button doesn't light up when you just have the class. The game's requirement is that you come *on* that class if you want to use that option.