Quote:
Originally Posted by
Lazaruz
The parsers are there, yes, but it's not a official software developed or endorsed by SE, so the stance of "Dont get caught harassing people with it, and we'll look the other way", becomes alot easier, since you're not "supposed" to have it to begin with.
I love how the "pro-parser" community though seem to have this idea that a official parser wont immensely complicate the harassment reports though, because you're talking about a official software, and it's quite easy to make the case of it being there and official means A) SE wants you to use it, and B) Since they want you to use it, the line between "harassment" and "critique" becomes alot more blurry, because again you're using a officially supported tool to base your "critique" on.
I feel like Miste summed this up quite nicely, but I would like to reiterate: are you clairvoyant? Can you see into/predict the future? How do you know that reports wouldn't be just as they are now? The argument many "pro-parsers" make in this thread is that, if SE developed and implemented an in-game, official parser, reports on blatant harassment (whether they involved said parser or not) would still be taken seriously and investigated. You make it sound almost as if this would not be the case if a parser was introduced and implemented.
Quote:
I also find it frankly astounding how many of you can only point to your own positive experience with parsers among friends and the like, while simultaneously crying foul over the people opposing parsers because of their negative experience with it.
And yet, no where in this thread have those that are "anti-parsers" have shared any of their own negative experiences with regards to parsing. Instead, they tend to just paint all "pro-parsers" with the same brush, insinuating that "well, that one guy I met who parsed was a jerk, therefore, all people who parse are jerks.". They don't add anything constructive to the argument of why they're against parsers other than gross misconceptions, generalizations, and just, in general, negative attitudes. No one in this thread who is "pro-parser" said that all people who parse are saints, and that the bad apples are a lie. Everyone one who is for parsers has recognized and noted that these jerks exist. But, rather than allow one or two players to paint the picture of the entire pro-parser community, instead we ask for those who are so hellbent that all people who parse or who want to parse be banned indefinitely, to be a little bit more open-minded, and stop painting us all with the same brush.
I'm sure that you probably don't like people making negative generalizations or assumptions about you. Perhaps you should try to empathize with those of us who don't appreciate being called jerks just because John Doe from Jerkland decided to harass Mary on her supposedly subpar DPS.
Again, Miste summed this up quite nicely: the "toxic" behavior is already present, with or without a parser. Those inclined to be jerks will continue to be jerks without a parser, or with one. My experience, most people that were jerks in this game never brought DPS or parsing into the picture. They were just being jerks for the sake of being jerks (an example: when Weeping City was new, and people kept pulling Ozma while the alliance was trying to explain mechanics to the plethora of new people in the raid because "I don't have time to wait for silly things like helping other people with new fights and new fight mechanics"; parsers and DPS output was never mentioned here).
Quote:
I have no reason to believe that as soon as SE drops the act and openly allows parser use, we wont see PF groups with "DPS over X, or kick", and the associated hostility once people are "sub-optimal". Because god knows if you enjoy min-maxing yourself to hell and back, you apparently have the right to impose it on every single person you come across.
These already exist. So, your point in bringing them up is...?
Again, no one is saying everyone will suddenly become Mother Theresa in this game if an official parser is introduced. Stop making false inferences.
I enjoy min-maxing myself, but I have many friends that are fine just playing super casually--they don't care about BiS, they don't care about Savage, they don't care about DPS, they don't even care about current or past Ex primals. Do I force my min-maxing playstyle on them? No. Do I force it on randoms? No. I do, however, encourage people to look into ways for self-improvement, no matter what job they play, because what's wrong with wanting to improve? However, if someone is fine being "just average" or "just as they are," well, then that's their choice. I don't agree with it, I don't understand it, but I don't harass or shame people about it.
Quote:
I regret getting involved in this topic, and it's a misstake I'll be rectifying immediately, as I have much better things to spend my time on then arguing with people both uninterested, and ignorant of the opposing view
Uh, okay? Pot calling the kettle black here, by the way, with that last sentence of yours. You seem pretty ignorant of the "pro-parser" side of things yourself.
Quote:
Your input has been noted. Now do me a favour and toss some at the people who went on page upon page of "WHY DONT YOU AGREE?!?!?!" just because they cannot fathom how someone couldnt have the same positive experience they had parsing among friends, when playing with complete randoms, and are labouring under some kind of delusion that just because THEY arent a complete asshole, it apparently means every single person ever that also parses, are not guilty of incredibly toxic behaviour
Actually, the majority of this thread is more like: "Parsers are bad! I may or may not have had a bad experience with them, therefore everyone who parses are bad people, and deserve to be reported and permanently banned from this game! I don't care if they use parsers for good/guides/theorycrafting/self-improvement! They are all bad!" You literally have one person who goes around reporting players based on "a hunch" that they may be "checking numbers," and who is advocating that people be banned because they stream their raids on Twitch or wherever and you see ACT in the corner. I fail to see how you missed that several-page argument.
The people arguing in this thread are, again, arguing against these select "anti-parser" posters to stop painting "pro-parsers" with the same brush.
Quote:
Either way, I'm gonna bugger off, since this echo chamber is getting rather blatant.
But I can say with certainty, that if SE ever implements a "official" parsing tool, it'll be the day my sub ends, permanently.
Umm. Okay?