«*I just care about clearing*»
Let’s see if week1 p8s agree …
Printable View
My "past content" would be "half of the time I'm not even trying to play optimised and just want my weekly/daily normal content loot". This doesn't tell you anything about how I would play in a hardcore environment when I am actually focused and prepared. This data is entirely useless for you.
Edit: It is also far from a complete image because I don't parse to begin with and these are just random logs from other people with whom I happened to be in a party. I have played plenty of Panda in the last months and none of these performances is recorded because the raiders who bother parsing and uploading that normal stuff have been on hiatus for weeks. And I bet this is the same for basically every other person who randomly got caught in the third party tool log stuff.
Do you ever think that people don't particularly care about clearing savage in a week?
One day you'll learn that savage raiding achievements end for most people at the clear. Being a world first clearer or a top parser means nothing to most people, I don't care if we spend a week to clear savage or month. We play the game for fun in my static not to instantly win.
WOWlog culture ruined the game for casual people trying to get into hard content because there's no entry point now, the exact same thing will happen in FF at least wow had the excuse that raiding takes hours, FF raiding takes an hour at most. If people want to parse it should be their choice the same way it's your choice to recruit parsers.
To preempt a response like that is exactly why I provided the link to the definitions. If you read the definition it explicity includes "online identifier".
Moving goalposts a bit there? First you question why someone would ever look at logs outside of joining a pf/statics. And call everyone that thinks otherwise paranoid. Then there is an example that had nothing to do with joining a pf/static, and is clearly against FF terms of service, and then it's "useful in the debate" (which it isn't).
(source: https://gdpr-info.eu/art-4-gdpr/ )Quote:
Article 4 GDPR - Defintion:
(1) personal data’ means any information relating to an identified or identifiable natural person (‘data subject’); an identifiable natural person is one who can be identified, directly or indirectly, in particular by reference to an identifier such as a name, an identification number, location data, an online identifier or to one or more factors specific to the physical, physiological, genetic, mental, economic, cultural or social identity of that natural person;
I'm not a lawyer but "online identifier" sounds about accurate.