Next Void Ark zone

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Risaka

I'm not sure if anyone posted this yet but there's a cave in the northeast corner of the Dravanian Forelands which has some Aztec like door tucked there :o

Looks like a possible entrance for that new Void Ark raid map :o

---

Based on the information we have, its mostly sure that is not.

The ruins on Dravania, have nothing to do with the ruins of the Mhach.
Those are 2 different civilisations, separated by thousands of years.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Frederick22

Also the ruins of dravania and the mhach has nothing to do with this.

---

Um last I checked, Mhach has everything to do with the Void Ark and its successor raid

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Frederick22

Based on the information we have, its mostly sure that is not.

Also the ruins of dravania and the mhach has nothing to do with this.

---

It's the Mhach capital that we're going to...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Risaka

I'm not sure if anyone posted this yet but there's a cave in the northeast corner of the Dravanian Forelands which has some Aztec like door tucked there :o

Looks like a possible entrance for that new Void Ark raid map :o

---

Not likely. The next area is likely the Yafaem Saltmoors, which is to the Southeast of Dravania, just to the northwest of Mor Dhona.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Risaka

I'm not sure if anyone posted this yet but there's a cave in the northeast corner of the Dravanian Forelands which has some Aztec like door tucked there :o

Looks like a possible entrance for that new Void Ark raid map :o

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Morningstar1337

Um last I checked, Mhach has everything to do with the Void Ark and its successor raid

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Alberel

It's the Mhach capital that we're going to...

---

Did you both read the comment of Risaka?

He said that the entrance of the second part of the "Shadow of Mhach" raid, is on the dravanian forelands.
The ruins where the "entrance" is, are the ruins of the elezen people that lived with the dragons after the events of Shiva.

Thats very much obious that is not. The ruins in Dravania Forelands, has no relation what so ever with the Mhach.

Plis read carefully >_>

Your words are sort of muddled. "The ruins of Dravania and the Mhach have nothing to do with this"-- "this" is almost certainly going to be taken to mean 'the next Void Ark zone' as described in the thread title, and Risaka's final line.

Your post definitely comes across as dismissing "the next Void Ark zone" as having "nothing to do with Dravania or Mhach" which is factually incorrect--because as others have pointed out, Void Ark and Mhach are pretty much the same thing--well, Void Ark is a product of the Mhachi anyway. It is correct in establishing the disconnect between Dravania and Void Ark though.

This failure to understand your meaning almost certainly stems from a lesson I learned in high school: "Don't let a sleeping 'this' lie. Make clear what 'this' is!" etc. You might've been served better by clarifying further: "The Mhachi/next Void Ark zone have nothing to do with the Dravanian Ruins in the Forelands" etc.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rocl

Your words are sort of muddled. "The ruins of Dravania and the Mhach have nothing to do with this"-- "this" is almost certainly going to be taken to mean 'the next Void Ark zone' as described in the thread title, and Risaka's final line.

Your post definitely comes across as dismissing "the next Void Ark zone" as having "nothing to do with Dravania or Mhach" which is factually incorrect--because as others have pointed out, Void Ark and Mhach are pretty much the same thing--well, Void Ark is a product of the Mhachi anyway. It is correct in establishing the disconnect between Dravania and Void Ark though.

This failure to understand your meaning almost certainly stems from a lesson I learned in high school: "Don't let a sleeping 'this' lie. Make clear what 'this' is!" etc. You might've been served better by clarifying further: "The Mhachi/next Void Ark zone have nothing to do with the Dravanian Ruins in the Forelands" etc.

---

I knew this was the only possible way someone could make an excuse of why they didnt "understand" my comment.
What I wrote what obious and easy to understand, even more with the comment I replyed, if some people misunderstood it, there is nothing I can do. Mistakes happen, just need to read carefully.

Sure you will continue to debate, keeping saing that Im wrong, but well I'm not here for that.

Thanks anyway.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Frederick22

I knew this was the only possible way someone could make an excuse of why they didnt "understand" my comment.
What I wrote what obious and easy to understand, even more with the comment I replyed, if some people misunderstood it, there is nothing I can do. Mistakes happen, just need to read carefully.

Sure you will continue to debate, keeping saing that Im wrong, but well I'm not here for that.

Thanks anyway.

---

I also had to read your post a few times to figure out what you meant. I don't think anybody is trying to be mean or 'one up' you.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Frederick22

Did you both read the comment of Risaka?

He said that the entrance of the second part of the "Shadow of Mhach" raid, is on the dravanian forelands.
The ruins where the "entrance" is, are the ruins of the elezen people that lived with the dragons after the events of Shiva.

Thats very much obious that is not. The ruins in Dravania Forelands, has no relation what so ever with the Mhach.

Plis read carefully >_>

---

That's not what you said though.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Frederick22

Also the ruins of dravania and the mhach has nothing to do with this.

---

In the context of the discussion your comment explicitly meant that the raid has nothing to do with Dravania or Mhach. I know English isn't your first language and this isn't a big deal but everyone did read your post correctly.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Frederick22

I knew this was the only possible way someone could make an excuse of why they didnt "understand" my comment.
What I wrote what obious and easy to understand, even more with the comment I replyed, if some people misunderstood it, there is nothing I can do. Mistakes happen, just need to read carefully.

Sure you will continue to debate, keeping saing that Im wrong, but well I'm not here for that.

Thanks anyway.

---

Because it is what you said. You may have meant somethine else, but they way you wrote it means the way he took it. There is no need to be agressive about it. It is just a language barrier mistake.