Accesory Slot Cost

Removing the slot points is fantastic, and I'm very happy about that. Not sure about removing actual equipment slots as a result of it, though. I would be okay if they cut down 4 rings to 2, and left the rest.

You know...they didn't actually say slots are being removed

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Buttons

>.> I was serious.

---

And I agreed with you, and I liked your post. Have fun and relax.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by weeble

booooo, removing the slot points is great, but then removing some of the slots? what is the difference. i don't care that u make the items stronger. i want to collect more gear. make the gears all weaker stats, and then make us go gear twice as many slots to get that strong. slots in concept is all about the journey of collecting them, i for one wanted no slot points cause it just meant going to kill nm's for earnings, rings and bracelets were relevant. so, either way i'm not impressed with this decision.

---

their main argument in a much older post was that they didn't want to eliminate slot cost because players already complain about inv space. I say let me manage my inv and just remove the cost. I didnt care if they kept a point system, but i have the same amount of points now as i did at rank 1, a point every even rank would have been good.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jabo

Why not reduce the number of slots to:
1 Necklace
1 Bracelet
2 Rings

and lose the slotcosts altogether

---

Why not keep it how it is and then you can just equip 1 necklace, 1 bracelet, and two rings.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Seikninkuru

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jabo

Why not reduce the number of slots to:
1 Necklace
1 Bracelet
2 Rings

and lose the slotcosts altogether

---

Why not keep it how it is and then you can just equip 1 necklace, 1 bracelet, and two rings.

---

Um...what?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Eekiki

Um...what?

---

You currently can choose what items you wish to equip. You can choose whether you want 4 rings, 1 ring, 2 bracelets, an earring, etc etc, can you not? My question was simply why is removal of the system necessary? You can currently do what is being requested.

(Though the request isn't surprising considering the irrational logic exhibited on the forums daily, ie: The screw is stripped, fuck it, demolish the whole thing and rebuild it!)

i lol'ed at people who didnt read properly, they are not going to remove the slot equipment, only limiting to how many accessories, which by term is no different than accessory points in a way. which is actually silly. =.="

but then again will wait for YP to clear the speculation on limitation.. geez, why can't i wear all of em' seriously, why? <_<"

Awesome to hear Bay. While we are losing accessory slots (I admit 4 rings is excessive), he said that the accessories themselves are getting stat changes to make up for it. I think 2 earrings/2 rings/1 bracelet/1 earring would probably be fair.

Or maybe I read wrong. oo;

i agree, i would love to wear them all, maybe not understanding what they mean since they always end up having to clear things up a second and third time in these threads>< i think they do it on perpos to see what the results are then change them as they go to make the majority happy since the game is being made to satisfy as many as possible and get as many subs in they can at launch. we must all be suckers lol.

i'm not worried bought inventory, but i sure am worried bout being bored with no gear to go set out to get or gear myself with. we will have retainers for 1 buck. buy em and u will be pleased.

also to add 4rings don't sound like alot. think bout it, they want to make craft gear just as important and relevent as mob drops and event drops. more slots makes this happen. 2rings to craft, 2 to get from events. 1 from a hnm, 1 from missions. 2 bracelets, 1 nm 1 craft and so forth. right?

i'd be happy with 12 charms on my necklace, 12 charms on each braclet lol, and words and inscriptions added into the rings to boot. and all that on top of materia. but i'm crazy like that lmao. :)