STOP Genderlocking Cosmetics!!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Eldevern

I guess people who say "it's as easy as a blink" talk about something they didn't experiment by themselves. They proably imagine it's just some kind of copy past. It's not.

Go do 3D models, two genders (two topologies), with animations, clothings. Do the copy past you think as "good enough", you will see how far you're wrong. Unless you don't care for quality.

If it is so easy, why do exist specializations in
texture
modeling
animation
code (C++)
code (OpenGL, DirectX)
3D engine (models, maps)
lights
effects
post-prod?
If it is that easy, one people could do all. Reality is different, ask yourself why.

---

I think people are mislead by YouTubers who make their own games and such. What they probably don't understand is what they're seeing is a heavily edited outcome of something that generally takes hours and days for the simplest things and most of the ones I've watched use premade assets to speed up the process.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Joven

I would say masculine fashion would be something, like feminine fashion, that accentuates a male's traits. Something like open shirts that bare the chest or ones that are sleeveless to show off muscle. Personally if I wanted my male characters to be dressed masculine I'd just have them with their shirts off. I already do that with my hrothgar alts. Outside of musculature and their bait'n tackle, men don't really have as much to focus on as women.

---

The semi-open shirts are a good point. Things like the Infantry shirt and the Holy Rainbow series (if only they'd given it a more sensible name) look better on men, and I feel like the female version with the visible bra underneath gives a "showing off" vibe to it where they're just casual loose-fitting shirts on men.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by KizuyaKatogami

Well a majority of it is as simple as you said. Gear that isn’t a frilly, ribbon fest is a good start. For me it would be headsets that maybe show more muscle or accentuates the chest/abs area of the males. Things of that nature. Like, for some of the frilly or ribbon-y healer outfits, they could easily just turn them into tunics. There’s a big difference between something like the hellfire set and the 2b set is what i mean. The hellfire set has that chest window which is semi-revealing but the overall glamour is pretty masculine. Things of that nature.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by KizuyaKatogami

Ty for the thought out response! :) Unfortunately i’m really not a fan of the modern glams. I’ve always been a fan of the medieval type of aspect ff has had [...] I kind of greatly dislike things like the hoodies and the baseball cap etc just because it feels so out of place and i’m a nerd who likes to feel immersed :p.

---

I'm honestly confused about what you're saying now vs what you've said in the past, which is usually how much you wanted 9S's gear... but that's modern, which you don't like. And if it had been given out as glamour like 2B's dress, it would have been unisex and would have looked good on female characters so wouldn't that have ruled it out for you anyway?

And the Hellfire armour is something I've always regarded as quite a feminine armour set and never would have expected to get brought up as an example of masculine gear. It's not feminine in the way that the 2B dress is shaped to suit a woman and literally falls flat on a male body shape, but I wouldn't put it on any of my male characters.

So just saying "I want more masculine gear" isn't enough to convey what you actually want. I had really assumed you must dislike the fantasy side of things because that's where male characters do get things that are (to me) unquestionably menswear.

I do agree more things could do with turning into tunics (though we're not totally lacking them as it is) - Ruby Cotton Chasuble is the big one that comes to mind that could have been altered, where just cutting the front flap short would do a lot to make it less dress-like while still being an ornate top and cape.

I find it ridiculous and offensive (but not surprising) that all of their effort has gone to making bras and panties wearable for men, while putting comparatively little time into allowing female characters to wear male clothing.

We all know why this is, and it's nonsense.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SolviteSekai

We all know why this is, and it's nonsense.

---

We do indeed know: female characters could already equip the male versions of most of the things they've made unisex so far, so there's nothing to unlock.

Also, given the forum's general trolling problem, I'm instantly wary of the motives of someone who spends their first post since 2013 reviving a ten-month-old argument with a potentially inflammatory statement.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SolviteSekai

I find it ridiculous and offensive (but not surprising) that all of their effort has gone to making bras and panties wearable for men, while putting comparatively little time into allowing female characters to wear male clothing.

We all know why this is, and it's nonsense.

---

Yes, resurrecting this thread was nonsense.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Iscah

We do indeed know: female characters could already equip the male versions of most of the things they've made unisex so far, so there's nothing to unlock.

---

Or maybe it's nonsense that my catgirl cant wear the miquote male shorts. Would that destroy the matrix and ruin the game?

The real reason is that male to female is hilariously over represented and nobody cares about female to male. Square wont get any virtue points for pandering to them.

For this very obvious reason, I can assure you male bunny suits and panties will always be priority number one. I'm sure it's a coincidence that Male Bunny's (uwu) were finished in time for Endwalker, and half of the people i know who play the game DIDNT EVEN KNOW they were adding female Hrothgar Soon(TM)

Yknow it's possible for both to be true right? This game needs more "masc" glams and also needs to stop genderlocking stuff. Both can be true.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SolviteSekai

Or maybe it's nonsense that my catgirl cant wear the miquote male shorts. Would that destroy the matrix and ruin the game?

---

Unlocking the race-and-gender-specific hempen sets is a whole separate kettle of fish again, given that they have ignored player requests to make them non-race-specific for years.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by anhaato

Yknow it's possible for both to be true right? This game needs more "masc" glams and also needs to stop genderlocking stuff. Both can be true.

---

I think the goal for Square Enix is definitely to have mainstream gaming articles about how males can wear bunny suits. I don't think their goal is to be accommodating. Hence why they went out of their way for that, and everything else is "we'll get around to it"

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Iscah

Unlocking the race-and-gender-specific hempen sets is a whole separate kettle of fish again, given that they have ignored player requests to make them non-race-specific for years.

---

Damn if only they had so many players they literally cant sell the game anymore and could invest that growth into something that represents everyone and not just what will get them props on twitter.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SolviteSekai

I find it ridiculous and offensive (but not surprising) that all of their effort has gone to making bras and panties wearable for men, while putting comparatively little time into allowing female characters to wear male clothing.

We all know why this is, and it's nonsense.

---

Wat.
What are you talking about lol.
What '' bras and panties ''?
The closest thing is the 2B legs and it's meant to be a leotard but is just a separate piece.

Female gear in the game is already significantly more varied than it is for male characters, it's not an actual problem for female characters at all just because some gear is different on female characters doesn't change this it's just a fact if you actually look at the gear in the game.
Adding more feminine or skimpy gear to male characters actually adds more variety to male characters, adding more pants and shirts to female characters wouldn't it'd be more of the same and what like 95% of the gear is.

And when we got stuff like the Noctis outfit it was the same for female characters there's not a conspiracy here as you seem to be implying.
There are people who want to wear feminine or skimpy outfits, it tends to more often than not lean towards female characters ( for women who play the game too btw ).
Probably a lot of reasons why there's a lot of stigma towards men being seen as sexual and showing off in a way more aimed at gay men and women but I fail to see why SE giving people who want that options is a problem.
Female characters already have all kinds of options at their disposal.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SolviteSekai

Or maybe it's nonsense that my catgirl cant wear the miquote male shorts. Would that destroy the matrix and ruin the game?

The real reason is that male to female is hilariously over represented and nobody cares about female to male. Square wont get any virtue points for pandering to them.

For this very obvious reason, I can assure you male bunny suits and panties will always be priority number one. I'm sure it's a coincidence that Male Bunny's (uwu) were finished in time for Endwalker, and half of the people i know who play the game DIDNT EVEN KNOW they were adding female Hrothgar Soon(TM)

---

You're reading so much into it based on very specific examples and your own feelings about not getting what you want in a particular case.