I don't think removing stances would do that. Drk would still have to manage it's MP around having enough for Dark Arts and enhancing it's moves to maximize it's performance. Warrior would still be dependent on stacks to execute their moves, all removing their stances would do is remove the one button press to swap to Deliverance/Defiance to use the move they want, not exactly a horrific loss of gameplay diversity. Removing stances on Pld would basically change nothing at all about their gameplay choices so I agree paladin needs some sort of extra mechanic to make tanking with it more engaging, but I don't think stance dependent moves are the solution.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lambdafish
Making Jobs Rotationally Easier in 4.0
Printable View
-
12-08-2016, 12:54 AMKhalithar
-
12-08-2016, 01:21 AMLambdafishWe can agree to disagree on that one, as in my opinion you have still simplified gameplay and the job feels a lot more hollow. However what I could propose is removing the DPS stance (except darkside as it's more like a bard song than a stance), and simply having the one button for stance dancing. All of WARs moves would then say "when defiance is turned on" and "when defiance is turned off", and PLD could share this.Quote:
Originally Posted by Khalithar
Remember that the devs have stated that jobs will be as difficult to play as they are in Heavensward, but not more difficult. -
12-08-2016, 02:20 AMshao32
more that remove our stances they need to improve it more, its a bad joke our tank stance become pretty useless this days, except drk how dps rotation is very close to a normal dps job the other 2 are pretty easy to play so i dont think they go to make our jobs more easy that is now, just more rewards on tank and emity bonus to other party members can be good, idk meaby whit more agro you have more damage the target get? whit lets say a max of 20% with full agro bar? that can be interesting and challenge us to have very high agro and do dps as well.
-
12-08-2016, 09:41 AMAwfulSo you'd want Drk to have no fun redeeming gameplay style? I personally find Drk very enjoyable (since I do main it) and I don't find Darkside or Grit intrusive I actually welcome them, I find it fun and easy to maintain my MP and stance dancing is just second nature to me. If they both went away it'd be very boring since you take away:Quote:
Originally Posted by Khalithar
-Dark Arts
-Dark Dance
-Dark Mind
-Dark Passenger
-Dark Arts + Soul Eater
-Dark Arts + Abyssal Drain
What would be the point of blood weapon then? What would we spend our MP on? What would be the point of Blood Price if mana isn't an issue? The class would be dead for me and I wouldn't play it I like what it is now and while it's not perfect it just needs updates in the future for 4.0 to bring new things to the table. -
12-08-2016, 01:05 PMThunda_Cat_SMASH
Agreed, I enjoy the stance aspect quite a bit, and don't see a reason to remove them at all, since they will literally become carbon copies of each other.
-
12-08-2016, 01:59 PMShurrikhanI would presume in that case none of those skills would require Darkside, rather than being removed by extension...Quote:
Originally Posted by Awful
Though I similarly would rather not see Darkside or Grit removed. I just want the Grit transition improved on a bit—that's it.
I like tank stances, in that they offset and reprioritization they provide actually make other skills less obligatory. Unless a new means to allow for that variety is introduced, I'd much rather "waste" a button on a tank stance than be forced to open with enmity-heavy skills every time, in those situations that wouldn't actually require it now so long as our tank stance is on, or, say, if fighting for enmity was removed from tank gameplay anyways, forcing us to use (hopefully much more powerful) survival weaponskill combos just to allow the healer to toss out an Aero III, a Bane, or a couple Gravity casts, etc. Darkside similarly allows me to prioritize saving mana for the next pull where it actually matters, or for AoEs. It might not be utilized hugely at the moment, but it's a hell of a lot better than nothing. (Though that's not to say that changes that could provoke such decisions based on button-less passive effects couldn't do at least as well; I lack the faith to assume that whatever changes that remove Darkside would seek also to make something at least as interesting in the aftermath.) -
12-08-2016, 05:20 PMKhalitharThat is correct. My point was to remove the MP drain component by removing darkside and having the main gameplay choice for Drk focus on managing MP for using Dark Arts as often as possible and weigh it against using a move now or saving it for later so moves like Blood Weapon and Blood Price still have a purpose. It would also have the added effect of removing the restriction on Blood Weapon which is something I feel should have been done a while ago. The cause of me thinking on this came from playing pld a lot more lately. I been tanking a whole bunch as drk the last few months and I decided to revisit pld again and I really noticed how there is basically no diversity in it's gameplay regardless of the stance you're in which lead me to thinking if they were even necessary in the first place.Quote:
Originally Posted by Shurrikhan
I'll stand by my assertion, I still think removing the stances and the damage penalty is a good idea. However, I will concede at this point that if they do that, they should add more interesting choices and combinations with the abilities we have and the new abilities we get.
I also stand by my other assertion that Pld absolutely needs SOMETHING to make the gameplay a little bit more engaging. I don't know what that could be but I still don't think stance restricted moves are the solution. -
12-08-2016, 05:37 PMShurrikhanFor me it's not just that tanking stances add something to gameplay in and of themselves. Rather, it's just that the balance for your outputs and needs as a tank would actually more heavily mandate certain skills to replace the stance's offset of that balance and thereby reduce the available choices within a certain situation. Having that simply overlying push towards the offensive or defensive allows for many more "shades" of combat choices in most scenarios, especially if not playing to exactly known circumstances. I feel like a similar system would have to be made available, and would likely require at least another button's worth of control, not to negatively impact the variety of play available to tanks upon removing stances. And at that point, there's no benefit in terms of combating button bloat. If the replacing system is more intuitive and engaging while providing mostly the same benefits, then by all means, replace the stances, but if not, then I don't much see the point.Quote:
Originally Posted by Khalithar
Darkside I could take or lose. For me it's kind of like swapping from a manual transmission to a DCT, but less significant still — I'd probably miss the clutch (Darkside toggling) for a bit, but forget about it having been a thing soon enough, as long as I still have the same capabilities and decisions to make as before (e.g. if it didn't also come with automatic rev matching).
At present Blood Weapon is actually one of the reasons I like Grit more or less how it is, oddly enough. I have this very desireable offensive focus phase every time it comes up, or preferably lasting for a full minute (one BW to the end of the next, with 3 Scourge applications over that time), that I have to weigh my defensive capabilities against in the context of the fight. It kind of takes you for the ride and making you hope like hell you made sure to have enough safeties ready, in part because Grit is so costly to swap back to if you didn't. Sure, when I started the job, that seemed a silly underutilization of an integral and thematic skill, but the gameplay it caused eventually seemed integral and thematic itself. Just food for thought.
Also, absolutely agreed on Paladin. I don't think stance-restricted moves are the situation, either, with perhaps the slight exception of something like defensive vs. offensive variants of certain skills. Personally, I'd been tinkering around with a dual resource system (Zeal and Ardor) while actually making Sword and Shield oath each more usable in the opposite function as well (Shield as nuke damage and utility while Sword is increasingly capable of defensive action), but I've still got nothing concrete, sadly. So far the I've had more luck with revisions to Sword Oath itself as to produce a modified combo system that should improve PLD gameflow, making Shield Oath a bit more shield-based and similarly providing some more interesting, unique benefits, atop a few gameplay-affecting core traits (e.g. RNG mitigation being usable to turn enemy attacks onto each other, passive covering traits, and something "Sword and Board"). -
12-08-2016, 06:37 PMGumbercules
Well seems the goal is to keep rotations across the board "the same" as lvl 60. Namely take this to mean nothing will get more complex than mnk or less complex than pld. On the side of tank stances, this one is kind iffy....on one side we have warrior and i feel stance dancing is a very important mechanic to its playstyle. That being said though I could see PLD doing without stances, and hell maybe even bring its shield into play more. Wouldn't even have to be a massive overhaul just increase the overall enmity of their RoH combo (to be on par on what it would do in shield oath over equal amounts of time) As some have pointed out most tank in DPS stances anyways so this would be ok and could bring more interesting mechanics to play with shield skills, even passively, like having shield based skills (shelltron, shield swipe, shield bash, etc) cause a deteriorating %chance to block buff over like 3-4 secs. I feel pld would benefit from a very active mitigation playstyle.
idk too much about drk tanking to be honest, got it to 60 then kinda stopped >.> Still could see it using mnk like stances for its darkside and grit playing into an "action used" kinda system with blood weapon and the mitigation one (forgot name) "forcing" the stance to persist for its duration. -
12-08-2016, 06:40 PMKhalitharI really don't believe Pld or Drk would be altered very much.Quote:
Originally Posted by Shurrikhan
Consider this: the playstyles/rotations we have currently for Pld and Drk wouldn't change in the slightest if we got rid of Grit/Darkside/Oaths.
It would arguably be a buff for Drk since they could now use Blood Weapon at all times and be able to play with Dark Arts a little more but the fundamental playstyle/rotations would not be changed in the slightest.
The change would definitely be noticeable on Warrior but given the five stack restriction and the variety of moves it has, it really comes down to knowing when to hit the right button at the right time. I don't believe that one button press to switch from defiance <-> deliverance really adds anything to gameplay. Let me give an example.
Currently: You're a 60 warrior and you're tanking. You have five stacks against a group of trash, do you need more threat? Switch to Defiance if you're not already in it and use Steel Cyclone. Is your threat good? Switch to Deliverance if you're not already in it and use Decimate.
My idea: You're a warrior and you're tanking. You have five stacks against a group of trash, do you need more threat? Use Steel Cyclone. Is your threat good? Use Decimate.
See the difference? The choices and the gameplay decisions are still there. All you've done is streamline it just slightly.
For Pld, a secondary resource system you build does sound good but that might be too similar to Warrior's stack mechanic, maybe if it was used to power up one move or to make yourself stronger? I got the guildhest earlier with the Dullahan enemy Bockman and I noticed they have a self buff move called King's Will that increases their damage. So here's two ideas:
1. Using Royal Authority grants Royal Will and increases the pld's damage by 10% lasts 15-20 seconds.
2. Royal Authority/Rage of Halone/Goring Blade grants Sacred Shield and makes your next Shield Bash cost 0 TP and increases it's potency to 400.
Obviously those numbers could be changed to whatever to make them balanced but you get the idea.