Yes, but then we have people in this very thread bringing up "healers wearing the sky pirate tank coat" as an example of immersion-breaking glamour. That coat would fit right in with the NPC character designs.
Printable View
For the record, novelty animal outfits are on the long list of things I wouldn't want to be put into.
But you are left alone. That's why it's amazing how insane people are. This option will not affect your game or gameplay in any way. Unless you enjoy flaunting your appearance to others in which case you're not doing it because you enjoy it, but because you want attention.
I fail to understand why there's an argument still going about a hypothetical feature that isn't even being considered by SE at this point.
To the people actually insulting others, really? That's mature.
It is the principle of the matter. I was fine staying out of the discussion until people started getting offended about advocates of the feature possibly having the benign option to have a toggle on the glamour. To me, it was a direct attack on choice which is something that does not sit well with me.
You didn't "refute" anything.
Me participating in this for 20 pages means I have no conviction and don't believe what I'm saying? Okay.
You're right, it shouldn't have to matter how many times I have to say it, in fact I could say it zero times and never post here and what I think wouldn't change.
Literally this entire thread be like:
https://media.giphy.com/media/13871fiv9kBfkQ/giphy.gif
I mean, can't we all just come to a fair compromise or something? It's just glam. It shouldn't be that big of a deal, loves. Me personally, if this feature was to ever happen I'd be okay with it since it wouldn't affect me and both parties would be happy. We'd do our thing, nobody would know if our outfits was set to default for each other and stuff. We're all here to have a good time and look amazing while doing it, after all ^-^