YOU THINK THIS IS FAIR ???

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by LessLoveLess8

Grammer has nothing to do with a lawsuit >.> u think the person who caused the "coffee is hot" labels for mcdonalds was literate or grammatically correct? no, but she did make off with 5 mil.

---

Somewhat unrelated but I can tell by this post you don't know what kind of burns she received and the damage they did. She had to get skin grafts. Don't downplay that shit, you just come off as completely ignorant.

Edit: Thank god. I see someone already addressed the stupidity of your post.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Estemy

It is so easy to say this when everything works for you. I bet, you'd be crying the loudest here if you had an unfair bill sent to you. To claim that those ppl at fault themselves is outrageous. Of course, mistakes happen, but not this many. This is definitely the result of a badly made site, with unclear guidelines or just plain bugs and errors.

---

maybe it was created to be hard to understand at first intentionally to weed out all of the stupid people? like a comprehension test or something

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ameroth

maybe it was created to be hard to understand at first intentionally to weed out all of the stupid people? like a comprehension test or something

---

Your stupidity is so indescribable that i cant say no more for your lack of intelligence but that ignorance is not a bliss in your case

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Refmo

Somewhat unrelated but I can tell by this post you don't know what kind of burns she received and the damage they did. She had to get skin grafts. Don't downplay that shit, you just come off as completely ignorant.

Edit: Thank god. I see someone already addressed the stupidity of your post.

---

lol some old dipshit spills coffee on herself and gets burned, and I'm supposed to believe it was the maniacal handiwork of the business that sold it to her? Forget that. If you're in your 60's and haven't figured out how to drink coffee without throwing it all over yourself, I call it Darwinism.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by LessLoveLess8

Thank you for the support, and i agree with everything you have said. Other than "What type of coffee ISN'T hot?" there are many kinds. However mcdonalds only recently started to carry anything but. So your statement stands. Just saying, i would expect someone to state soon that...

"There are many kinds of cold coffee, lots and lots, and i for one like the warning labels, it helps me to know for one that someone got rich off the idea that they noticed they were not there and that makes my sexual organs tingle."

---

True. I imagine, however, that if she went to McDonalds, and didn't intentionally order an iced coffee, and the drink she picked up was warm in her hands, she should have been able to deduce that the beverage was, indeed, hot. :P

But yes, you're welcome. :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Drakent

Your stupidity is so indescribable that i cant say no more for your lack of intelligence but that ignorance is not a bliss in your case

---

you're*
can*
*(don't need the 'a' before bliss)

thank you for helping prove my point.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Refmo

Somewhat unrelated but I can tell by this post you don't know what kind of burns she received and the damage they did. She had to get skin grafts. Don't downplay that shit, you just come off as completely ignorant.

Edit: Thank god. I see someone already addressed the stupidity of your post.

---

you should also have noticed that i replied with



Ohhh dear sir,

The fact that she was hurt (dont care) does not matter to me because i didnt know her, and am a fairly cynical person. I could care less if it melted off her legs into her stomach.

That does not change the fact that she did not understand that coffee (which was at the time for mcdonalds, generally hot) would be hot, or she could atleast have tested the fact before picking up the cup, as it would have been, a fairly hot cup, to melt off her legs.

However, The fact of the matter is, that does not change the fact, that you have to be anywhere close to literate to win a case in court. Which was the point i was making. as stated, in a quote from your post "Grammer has nothing to do with a lawsuit >.>"

In this case, "Your" was correct. =P

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ameroth

you're*
can*
*(don't need the 'a' before bliss)

thank you for helping prove my point.

---

Stop trying you are only hurting your self

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ameroth

you're*
can*
*(don't need the 'a' before bliss)

thank you for helping prove my point.

---

...so he meant to say "that i can say no more for you are lack of intelligence"