Originally Posted by
OliverQ
Some Spoilers here, read at your own risk.
The Ascians' goal was literally to wipe out all life on the Source and every shard so they could bring back a "paradise" they screwed up and didn't deserve to have anymore. You can not seriously claim they were in the right in any of this story. We can question the morality of what Venat did with the Sundering, but what Emet-Selch and the others wanted wasn't any better. He doesn't even think any other living beings deserve to exist, because they're not perfect and there is nothing wrong with murdering them.
The Archbishop and the 4 houses spent centuries peddling a lie about the founding of Ishgard that guaranteed an aristocracy while the rest of the people suffered and lived in poverty. They declared war against the Dragons ages ago by murdering Ratotaskr, and now they're facing the consequences. Getting rid of the Archbishop and his evil knights was the correct action.
Garlemald and the Emperor were clearly evil and they were part of the Ascians plan to destroy the Source and its reflections. Again, stopping Garlemald was correct.
Why should the Ascians get to restore the planet they ruined, at the expense of everyone who currently exists? The Ascians had their chance, and they failed. So you think it's ok that they want to murdered millions of people on the Source and all reflections?
Sorry, but your entire argument here is "It's totally cool if the Ascians want to go full mass-murder to bring back the good 'ol days because they don't think anyone in existence today deserves to live." That's not a good thing and I'm glad we were able to stop them.