It just feels like literally anywhere but pacific coast states would be better. Even Florida would be better (population is located mostly at the east coast) and probably has better routes. They had so many places to choose from..
Printable View
It just feels like literally anywhere but pacific coast states would be better. Even Florida would be better (population is located mostly at the east coast) and probably has better routes. They had so many places to choose from..
That map hasn't been updated. http://www.ntt.com/en/services/data-...center/us.html
Although the Data Center in Texas was new, it was still definitely available on the table.
But it didn't improve things for pretty much everyone. I asked one of my linkshells and my FC how they faired since the switch and only about 6 of them said they felt more responsive, there was about 30+ people online when I asked this and got a response from about 22 of them. The 16 that didn't favor it were mostly east coast and Midwest players, only 1 was from Washington and somehow pinged in the mid 100s though he suspected it was something on his end. SE overall goofed on this but really it should have been expected given their track record.
Oh wow, the fact that NTT has a datacenter in Texas makes the choice of Sacramento even more baffling.
Can confirm that this has most likely been in the works for several months, as the IP block was assigned at the end of last year:
Code:network:IP-Network-Block:204.2.229.0 - 204.2.229.255
network:Created:2016-12-28 05:21:51.205854+00
network:Updated:2016-12-28 05:21:51.205854+00