I really hope that they make bigger zones.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Shioban

Maaaybe in future expansions when the PS3 support is dropped; http://www.reddit.com/r/ffxiv/commen...yoship_part_2/

---

Where exactly does Yoshi-P mention dropping PS3 support in that interview?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Blissa

I guess you never played FFXI then, there was plenty of things to do in every zone. They could do the same thing here.

---

Hmmm, I remember plenty of zones with nothing to do in them in FFXI.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Xavos

Graphics are a lot better in FFXIV..

---

And back then when the PS2 FFXI first came out the graphics where the best you could get.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dreamer

mid-range PS3 game

---

mid-range PS3 game? how many PS3 games do you play FF is by far one of the best looking PS3 games made that and the last of us

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ferocious

Terrible logic. FFXI graphics and PS2 tech were fairly on par because PS2 was still pretty fresh when FFXI released. FFXIV came out for PS3 on end of its lifespan when its technology is ancient. This console generation also lasted longer than last one, which makes the matters worse. FFXI was to PS2 what FFXIV will be to PS4.

---

What you said here is very true.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mogi

mid-range PS3 game? how many PS3 games do you play FF is by far one of the best looking PS3 games made that and the last of us

---

Whoa there. I like FFXIV as much as the next guy, but it certainly isn't one of the best looking PS3 games. FFXIV doesn't have top notch graphics for a PS3 game because they had to account for having a lot of characters on screen with a lot of combinations of gear. Just observe the other players in the world and you'll see that their animations have fewer frames, it's even worse with NPCs.

FFXIV is a good looking game, but certainly nowhere near the best looking PS3 games. Though calling it a mid-range PS3 game would be going too far.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Gilthas

Where exactly does Yoshi-P mention dropping PS3 support in that interview?



Hmmm, I remember plenty of zones with nothing to do in them in FFXI.

---

Then obviously you didn't get very far in FFXI. Almost every zone had a NM something to do with the story, a place to level or AF gear.

If they're going to make it bigger, better make those mounts a bit faster. I only want to expand the maps by adding swiming or things to explore. Just see at the people reaching weird places (Meant to be unreachable) in-game, they want some exploration too.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Blissa

Then obviously you didn't get very far in FFXI. Almost every zone had a NM something to do with the story, a place to level or AF gear.

---

Um, so basically the same as in FFXIV? You do get a reason to visit each zone here too between the main storyline, questing, Hunting log, gathering, and doing TH (I think I've actually done THs in every single overworld area in the game already).

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Blissa

Then obviously you didn't get very far in FFXI. Almost every zone had a NM something to do with the story, a place to level or AF gear.

---

Curious. You say almost every zone had a NM, something to do with the story, a place to level, or get AF Gear correct?

How is that any different than now? (FATEs, something to do with story, place to level, technically get AF gear but really those become instanced fights)

Just curious at the difference.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TheUltimate3

Curious. You say almost every zone had a NM, something to do with the story, a place to level, or get AF Gear correct?

How is that any different than now? (FATEs, something to do with story, place to level, technically get AF gear but really those become instanced fights)

Just curious at the difference.

---

The difference is FFXIV zones are super small you can ride the choco from one side of the zone to the other in 2 minutes or less and FFXIV zones were huge. There is no immersion to this game.