Quote:
Originally Posted by
Avidria
I think part of the problem is there's a bunch of information missing, too much imo to fully understand what made Venat make the choices she did. We get a cliff notes summary of how she came to the conclusion that mankind was following a dangerous path, and the only way to get them to follow a different course was by force. I do kinda like that she's a flawed character, though. And she acknowledges that herself.
Agreed that we lack information but again, the key limiting factor here is the closed time loop and the restrictions placed on what the characters could do. This would be the case regardless.
She had resolved not to tell the Convocation about it all to avoid them losing Hermes's expertise (whatever value it even had at that point), and based on her wording, about bringing those into the fold who could be trusted, I doubt she shared this information generally speaking at all. The way her inner circle speaks, and the Watcher characterises them, it's questionable whether even they knew. Part of it seemed to hinge on the respect she commanded amongst them IMO.
Quote:
We don't know how long it took Hermes to design and create a creature that could travel long distances through space very quickly, or if it could be easily and quickly replicated, OR if anyone else had done the same thing - Meteion isn't a documented creation, the details of how she works are in Hermes head only and there's no guarantee he'd offer them up if he was told what was really going on.
But by that point in the time loop she'd already been tagged and I don't doubt that the ancients possessed methods of extracting information by force from Hermes if they absolutely had to. Hythlodaeus's dialogue at the end shows they knew of at least one method, i.e. that of cleansing the soul in the Underworld. They're a smart bunch, so I've little doubt they could devise other methods if they didn't already have some. Both Emet and Hyth already knew their memories were tampered with and her mind was available to scry.
Quote:
We don't know that the other Ancients would've agreed with whatever solution Venat could've come up with even assuming they did believe her.
True, and that may be because they could've devised solutions that didn't entail fracturing their entire star.
Quote:
The Amaurotines couldn't even agree on whether they should offer help to other people on Etheirys who were dying to the Final Days before it got to Amaurot. It was an interesting debate to them before it started to literally burn their home to the ground. Say they don't have time to stop Meteion before the Final Days are on them. If they have their shield and their all powerful deity, why would they need to do anything about Meteion? They already know the shield will work, and already know there's a potential way to undo the sacrifices needed to make it work. If Meteion's song is potentially also killing everything between her and Etheirys, well... is that really their problem? The answer to that ties in with...
People bring this up often but the reason the Amaurotine pressing for non-intervention had nothing to do with them being apathetic about their situation, but to do with the concern that that city's autonomy would be stripped from it in the process. Furthermore, the big issue with the shades is that they seem to be a mash up from different points in time, and we know this phenomenon eluded them and was being studied, so the information that shade had at that point is potentially not the picture they had by the time a full appreciation of it was gained and shared with the public. Nonetheless, it is pretty clear that the Convocation took it as a serious threat and was working on a solution to it, which we know was Zodiark. What took everyone by surprise was the speed it acted with - even so, 75% of their populace voluntarily agreed to sacrifice. The point of the debate scene was more to show how they reasoned out their differences.
Provided they had evidence to work from - the sort of evidence that was memory-wiped from Emet, Hermes and Hyth - they'd at least have a far more solid basis to act upon. If not immediately act upon it, then at the least to begin with to investigate it further. Much as they did with the Final Days phenomena, IMO.
Quote:
Well. We don't know much about how the rest of the 14 would've acted with this foreknowledge. Emet at least would probably side with Venat, but I dunno about everyone else. We don't even know why Azem defected and, apparently, sided with no one. It's kinda head scratchy. But apparently enough of the general public disagreed with whatever Venat did end up saying/doing that the group loyal to her was a very small minority.
There's just a lot of question marks. I mean, I'm just speculating on all of this. I just think it's interesting to think about, I dunno. The story definitely had some flaws, and a few points I didn't like, but at the end of the day I still enjoyed it.
I agree that there's a lot of question marks, and the use of time travel in this case might entrench some of them for good.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
hydralus
The closed time loop didn't make a whole lot of "sense". It makes sense in the way that things have to happen a certain way for the future to happen, but it paints Vanet in a very sinister light.
I think the ancients had plenty of ability to stop Meteion all on their own without being sundered. They effectively nullified Meteion's influence on them by summoning Zodiark to make a huge aether shield. If they actually knew what the outside threat was that caused the problem, surely they could have found a way to fight it. They MADE Meteion. Even if they couldn't directly fight her, they could make a much larger army of dynamis-using soldiers who would not be linked by a hivemind. And a larger army almost always beats a smaller one.
But Vanet didn't even give them a chance by telling them what they could do to beat her. She just gave them some bull about they have to live with pain and suffering to make them stronger. You know that old saying "Whatever doesn't kill you will make you stronger"? Try telling that to Arenvald who is reduced to being a cheerleader for people who actually get to do things.
And before anyone wants to say the justification is that people wouldn't believe her, just stop. She's a highly respected prior member of the convocation and Emet, Hythelodeus and Hermes just came out of a mind-wiping 'accident'. Who the Hell would people believe more? Even if they didn't believe her, she knows the future! She can tell them the final days are coming and she knows the cause. When the final days come, you cannot tell me people wouldn't believe her. She even tagged Meteion and knows where she fled to.
Did she not tell them because the closed-time loop insists the future needs to happen a certain way? That's a really shoddy storytelling device and it isn't a justification. It's up to the writers to have the closed-time loop make sense on its own merit. Vanet knowing what was going to happen should have changed the future unless she likes the idea of slaughtering her people so she can become a messiah. Which I'd 100% get behind but they never went with it for the story.
Precisely my issue with the whole thing. The time loop is really the culprit behind why she could not tell them anything and why it'd all play out that way one way or another... so in the end, you're just stuck with a bunch of what-ifs and reasoning that is so constrained by the time loop, it comes across as unsatisfactory.