They straight up said 'we didn't really know what to do with SCH'. So if people give ideas for SCH and 90% of the ideas are bad and 10% are good, that's still better than what the devs have got, which by their own admission is 'idk lmao'. If what they came up with when 'they didn't really know what to do with SCH' is a partywide sprint/mit, and whatever Protraction is trying to be, then 7.0 will likely have even less to go with because the few passable ideas they did have, were added in with 6.0. Even if the 'bad ideas' here make them think 'this is such a bad idea, in fact it is so bad we should do X instead', then the bad idea prompted that 'good idea' from the devs and that's still a win indirectly caused by someone giving their feedback
