Monk/Trailer theory

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by KitingGenbu

I'll be honest, I didn't read past the first sentence

---

Lol neither did I. This theory will just get drowned like all the other theories. *Shrugs*

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Terribad

Lol neither did I. This theory will just get drowned like all the other theories. *Shrugs*

---

*Shrugs*, it's a decent theory. It sounds like it'd be making MNK similar to how AST currently works. I'd be in support of the change, if that's what they are going for.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kaurie

*Shrugs*, it's a decent theory. It sounds like it'd be making MNK similar to how AST currently works. I'd be in support of the change, if that's what they are going for.

---

Never said the theory was bad nor good, I didn't read it so I can't say. Just thought the reasoning was silly and agreed with A poster.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SessionZero

Honestly, I think people are reading into the trailer a bit too much. The Heavensward trailer did three things:

1. It told us it would be set in Ishgard.
2. It told us that Dragoons would be the focal job of the expansion.
3. It got us hyped to fight some f*cking dragons.

If you look at the Stormblood trailer (which is actually a trailer of the trailer), it does pretty much the exact same thing:

1. It tells us it will be set in Ala Mhigo.
2. It tells us Monk will be the focal job of the expansion.
3. It gets us hyped to anime fight some f*cking Garleans.

---

Thank you for being a voice of reason. This is really a waste of time. People are reading way too deep into really shallow information. You're all a bunch of nerds, go wash the dishes or something.

This thread makes me sad.

"So I've got a theory..."
"Pah, don't even bother."

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dreamsoap

Thank you for being a voice of reason. This is really a waste of time. People are reading way too deep into really shallow information. You're all a bunch of nerds, go wash the dishes or something.

---

Unnecessarily offensive. People are reading deep into a trailer for an expansion of a game they love. As I said earlier in this thread, there is a series of videos from IGN that do exactly that with a wide variety of trailers. It's not uncommon.

Surprised your post, which contributes nothing to the conversation and just insults a bunch of people, got 2 upvotes.

Do you have anything to offer that shows that the OP would be wrong in their theory, based on the trailer?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kaurie

Unnecessarily offensive. People are reading deep into a trailer for an expansion of a game they love. As I said earlier in this thread, there is a series of videos from IGN that do exactly that with a wide variety of trailers. It's not uncommon.

Surprised your post, which contributes nothing to the conversation and just insults a bunch of people, got 2 upvotes.

Do you have anything to offer that shows that the OP would be wrong in their theory, based on the trailer?

---

No, because I don't care. Time is a thing that happens, and more information will be revealed as it passes. And are you serious? Offensive? I couldn't have tried harder to make it sound sarcastic. You people are way too fragile these days.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dreamsoap

No, because I don't care. Time is a thing that happens, and more information will be revealed as it passes. And are you serious? Offensive? I couldn't have tried harder to make it sound sarcastic. You people are way too fragile these days.

---

Making something sound sarcastic is often an easy way to offend someone. Calling people a bunch of nerds and telling them to go wash dishes both directly insults them and indirectly insults them. I am not sure how you can't see that you were being offensive.

If you don't care, why have you posted twice in this thread. Just stay away if you have nothing constructive to contribute.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kaurie

Making something sound sarcastic is often an easy way to offend someone. Calling people a bunch of nerds and telling them to go wash dishes both directly insults them and indirectly insults them. I am not sure how you can't see that you were being offensive.

If you don't care, why have you posted twice in this thread. Just stay away if you have nothing constructive to contribute.

---

This is too precious. I was seriously just joking, but if you want to be that defensive over your game theories, sure. Live up to the namesake I gave you. Lmao. xD

More proof of ignorant folks assuming things when the read just takes a few seconds.

In regards to the OP, I think the title of this thread is misleading. In regards to your idea on the revamp of "Fists of" skills, it definitely could work, kind of like stance dancing for War or Astrologian does now (and what I hope they do for War is consolidate IB/FC and SC/Decimate). Giving more flavor to classes through stance dancing could add versatility, and maybe allow for different battle mechanics due to this diversity.