So why is Tetragrammaton have that perticular name?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tint

http://www.eliyah.com/tetragrm.html

---

I thought it was a shout out to these guys.

Neither really make much sense in an FF context, though lol

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by MilesSaintboroguh

If people never read instructions given out by the NPCs in the Steps of Faith trial, what makes you think a name change is going to have them read it?

---

Or basic guildhests for that matter...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tint

probably because a skill wich is worth the name Cure 4 would be too powerfull at the current state. it should have a potency around 800. and unlike blm with his rotation and buff a whm have to be able to use his skills all the time without locking them behind a buff.

---

It seem like SE taking final fantasy tactics approach. Cure 1 = regular heal. Cure 2 = strong heal. Cure 3 = AoE heal. Cure 4 = strong AoE heal. If you follow this. By spamming cure 3, you can proc cure 4 which will result in small area massive AoE heal. I doubt it will be 800 potency. More like, 650 potency.

take the cheese from the Illuminati goblin? this game tell you who they with just by names and symbols

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AngelicSence

If you follow this. By spamming cure 3, you can proc cure 4 which will result in small area massive AoE heal.

---

I don't think that would be a good approach for a healer. Mostly because chances are encounters would be balanced around your access to Cure 4, so putting it on a proc creates inconsistency which is something you really don't want on a healer. If you don't balance fights around WHM having Cure 4, that would either make WHM OP in raid content (as in considerably better healing throughput compared to AST/SCH) or make the spell itself trivial (sort of how Cure V was in FFXI since it healed for such a great amount and cost so much MP that most WHMs considered it a waste of MP because Cure IV was more efficient).