There's not a significant enough difference in numbers between male and female PC's to warrant the discrepancy with glamours. We have only a handful of male exclusive pieces that don't have female exclusive equivalents (talismans come to mind). There's tons of female exclusive glamours that don't have male exclusive equivalents, though. We get "female" and "unisex" around here.Quote:
Originally Posted by Blood-Aki
So yeah, we kinda are neglected.
So its 0-2 in the male female glamour department, yay?
Printable View
-
10-26-2015, 03:58 PMAshkendor
-
10-26-2015, 03:58 PMBreathlessTaoThen our definitions of "most" differ greatly. "Most", to me, in this sense, would mean something like 80-20. Which the stats are very far from.Quote:
Originally Posted by Blood-Aki
-
10-26-2015, 04:00 PMBlood-AkiThat study isn't very accurate as i already explained why in my previous post..again.. read it. unless they can somehow filter out "bots"Quote:
Originally Posted by BreathlessTao
-
10-26-2015, 04:00 PMToguro
With the amount of Male Midlander bots around in the NA servers... don't even look at or consider the census. It's wrong
-
10-26-2015, 04:06 PMGalaktica
Really? Another bunny outfit? Minfila's dress?
Because we totally needed more cutesy gear to go along with the new cutesy hairstyles uuuuuugh ffs why does every female glamour have be something "cute"
But I digress, Male PCs totally get the short end of the stick. I won't deny that. It knda sucks, but they probably did the math and realized they'd make way more money this way. -
10-26-2015, 04:10 PMBreathlessTaoThat's not even new either, by the way, there have been NPCs in the GS with one of those ears bent since ... pretty much GS was implemented I think?Quote:
Originally Posted by Azper
I'm pretty sure they have means to filter out at least the majority of the bots, if they want to. Regardless, keep on dodging the issue as much as you like, it won't make it go away.Quote:
Originally Posted by Blood-Aki
-
10-26-2015, 04:13 PMBlood-AkiAre you really that naive? if they could "filter out" the bots that easily then they wouldnt be having a massive bot issue to begin with, that go undetected for weeks on end, Its not a matter of dodging the issue, there is no issue, its a matter of you being in denial, they are catering to what the playerbase mostly consists of, females (characters, since you have trouble getting points) Once you accept that, you might be a little happier.Quote:
Originally Posted by BreathlessTao
-
10-26-2015, 04:34 PMBreathlessTaoBots too are buying the game and paying the subs - enough said. And contrary to how you keep pressing it, an overall 4% difference doesn't constitute to "mostly", especially not in as big a ratio as the gear gender-balance is skewed.Quote:
Originally Posted by Blood-Aki
-
10-26-2015, 05:04 PMsirDarts
Well the thing is, a female wearing a male outfit is generally accepted throughout the civilized world. On the other hand a male wearing a female outfit is not generally accepted (yet).
This creates the issue that most (pretty much all) "male" outfits become unisex, while most female outfits are female only. -
10-26-2015, 05:08 PMSerilda
Consider also that the bigger female bias is in Europe, which is probably not the biggest region in terms of subscriptions going by the way it's treated, so the logic of adding all of the percentages together makes no sense at all. And don't confuse cause and effect; every time we complain that female characters are getting an ever-increasing number of special outfits just for them a bunch of trolls reply that we should just switch to playing female characters. It's not unlikely that some people do in fact do that.
If I'm paying the same subscription as someone with a female character I expect an official response on why I keep getting less content, and a change in the pattern of female/unisex glamours. It's really not complicated.