it's not the final build, it's a beta build that expires next year.
Printable View
Yep. That's a huge pet peeve of mine too. I use the hell out of that search. Performance gains aren't there, it's not designed for desktops (whether it works for them is besides the point) and they've removed usability features such as the aforementioned start menu search (along with the start menu itself). Forget about it, I'm not installing it just because 7 < 8.
The start menu search is there. There's just no obvious field for it..
Press the windows key to bring up start and begin typing, the search results show immediately and then divided by files, applications, and system settings.
For Example:
I type "Fantasy Fantasy" at the start menu. The first default field is the applications, which will show Final Fantasy XIV immediately. Then if i were to hit the down key or click on the "Files" tab it will show all of the Final Fantasy audio tracks/folders.
Your article links are also flawed.
2 of them being the same story about Gabe not liking the new store commissions.
The other is somewhat legit. the start menu can become clumbersome with when installing alot of games, but this is remedied by simply typing the title of the game you wish to play.
The comment on it harder for OC'd CPUs alot not a big deal. If it's not stable in Win8, guess what, it's not stable on Win7 either.
https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-I...indows8sys.jpg
I've been testing windows 8 on laptops, tablets, and touchscreen devices for the past year. Click the desktop tile and it's the same look and feel. It works fairly well. DP was pretty bad compared to CP and RP. However they run pretty damned well these days. Metro takes some getting used to but i seldom use it, so it's not a big deal to me.
Also I glanced at the kotaku article. Their complaint means it's bad for game developers because they have to code more. not bad for gamers themselves.
Maybe you should try it yourself. or don't. I don't care. But posting an opinion of something without trying it is kind of douchy.
Hmm, in that case, I shall perhaps have to try it at some point. I'm not afraid to try new things just because most people don't like them (though I'll admit I never did upgrade to Vista). It's just that I do not like to take steps backwards, hence my previous post. That being said, I just finally got my computer running just the way I like it; I'm hesitant to tear it all down and start from scratch with a new OS. I suppose I could set up a new partition, but I'm running out of space... Could buy a new harddrive... /em walks off mumbling to himself.
You can download the final build right now and try it for 90 days.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/eval.../jj554510.aspx
Tbh, the biggest problem with windows 8 is that for desktop users, it's an update for the sake of an update. There is nothing wrong with windows 7. It's not like going from Vista to 7. At least vista tried to make some improvements over XP, it failed, but at least it tried. To get the most out of 8 on a desktop, you have to side step the new features to get functionality similar to 7. To what end?
Obviously that's not the case on a tablet, I'm actually all for it on a tablet. I'll be buying the Surface just as soon as I can get my hands on one.
http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c2...yofWindows.jpg
So yeah... Plus the latest NVIDIA drivers make your card DirectX 11.1 compatible. At least that's what my information tab on the NVIDIA driver settings tells me. I have GeForce 555M GT with 3GB of RAM.