there are no crystals in T7 ._.
T6 maybe ? ;D
Printable View
there are no crystals in T7 ._.
T6 maybe ? ;D
I do ^^
Seriously, it seems that most poison type DoTs do not apply on non-moving mobs that have low HP. It doesn't matter whether they apply or not tbh in these cases. It counts rocks, metallic objects, and a few neglictible things.
Atomos may fall in that non-moving category, causing the DoT-resistance. An overseeing from the devs due to the intended strat I assume
There's actually a logical reason behind this. The poison the NIN apply to their daggers are from various poisonous creatures, whose venom melts through all manner of things. The various SMN/SCH DoTs work because they're corrupting aether, something all matter has in Eorzea. But you cannot inject actual poison into something non-living, nor can you Disembowel something non-living. This is why neither of those two abilities work on things such as the boulders in Copperbell HM.
It's just the bard's curse. Think of BRD in FFXI, and of how any boss/NM from Wings of the Goddess and upwards is immune to Foe Requirem, BRD's main debuff. It's just how Se looks at bard.
A lot of misinformed people here... wow. Yes, the nails in Ifrit Extreme cannot be venomous bit, and yes, the inanimate objects in WP HM cannot be venomous bit. It always seems to be an enemy that cannot attack back directly. I have no idea why it doesn't work either, it's probably some dumb lore reason.
Except, this doesn't actually work. Summoner spells description alone breaks your logic by the simple quote. "Causes fever and lungs are failing." Rocks, Totems, and Dragon heads (In WoD on the 2nd boss are immune to Venomous bite too.) do not have lungs or white-blood cells. And even then, it's still the same concept. It's both poisons. If we got by that same logic, bard should be nearly worthless against these objects alone. How effective exactly is an arrow against a rock? Chances are, it won't pierce. It's more likely to ricochet.