Quote:
Originally Posted by
Zanarkand-Ronso
....you know she isn't going to be in her 'Current Form' right?
Theres no way you already forgot she is going through changes.
:x Yeah I don't think this conversation is being done with much good faith...
Quote:
Adding Krile, in her current form, isn't going to bring us anywhere closer to this goal.
I assume he meant "As Krile stands now, she won't be an interesting character. Naturally she needs changes, but we haven't seen any indication of it".
None of her traumas got acknowledged, her mindset wasn't explored. Sure, they'll change things (because they have to), but I fear it might be too little too late? Remains to be seen, for sure.
Quote:
You mean your Check-list Archetypes. A Charming Thief, and the Meat Head.
Quote:
Give us a cast as vibrant and unique as those of FFIX, FFX, the Dragon Age games, and so on.
You're both mirroring your flaws.
Aveyond is right, we need a bit more diversity. Some have no role in the party, others have a role but no narrative gravitas.
But, other games aren't necessarily more diverse simply because they have a role in the plot and the party. Even in FF9 and 10 you have characters who are "kinda there" like Kimahri.
Zanarkand is right in that a lot of RPGs resort to blank archetypes. We should question these tropes and demand exploration than just "a predictable character pattern".
But tropes exist for a reason: they're frameworks. Using structures like these doesn't make a narrative poor. They can allow us to better understand some characters, their skillset and intuition, justifying their inclusion in the plot. What's important is being able to flesh them out past that initial stereotype, and subverting the role whenever necessary. Tropes exist for narrative purposes, they're healthy. "Charming Thief" can still be endearing WITH plot relevance without blandly applying its generic definition. It's why Joker works, whereas others like Dack Fayden in MtG suck.
And Aveyond does address this somewhat:
Quote:
People are sick of the "but he's your little brother!" trope. People are sick of the "sassy smart lady" trope. People are sick of seeing the men in the cast be treated as if they were less intelligent than the aforementioned sassy smart ladies.
To aveyond,
Quote:
Heroines should have compelling arcs, replete with emotion, loss, drama, and sacrifices. Male heroes should sport more traditionally attractive physiques, and rather than gush about their traumas or be reduced to occasionally saying some fighting words, should be allowed to showcase their struggles and how they overcome their inner turmoil in appealing, non-whiny ways.
I'd say both. It's important to defy expectations of masculinity and femininity. Men have drama and emotion, women can be unattractive. At the end of the day, the important bit is having a character worth giving a damn about.