I am talking about the curvature of the chest.
Are you saying there is no curvature of the chest area on a Highlander compared to a Lala? I highly disagree.
If you are showing off cleavage in excess, you have designed gear that is curved. It's not just "covering" or something. The entire gear piece has a curve to it to cover the areas. If you want to slap that gear on a man, it will have the same curves to cover his man-boobs. The difference is that unisex gear doesn't show off boobs, or it's completely different armor set if it is (which mind you is perfectly acceptable solution to this problem) but what it boils down to is a brand new piece of gear that they have to design.
The argument here is "We can't just turn off the Female Only flag and have the gear look right on a man. It must be redesigned." While the opposite is almost always not true. We can slap man-gear on a woman and call it a day because it still covers all the right parts and shapes.
I'm not really defending their argument, I'm just not sure how you can't see that men with boobs would be awkward but women with nubs under loose fitting clothes is fairly normal.
Are you thinking of clothes in real life that shape to form? Because gear doesn't. It's designed in a particular shape.
