i agree...BUT SE embrace and let the players use NiN as a tank instead of nerfing Utsusemi, same way they pretty much made Samurai a dps
Printable View
Because Yoshi wants to play his Night Elf Death Knight.
FFX doesnt have classes. ¿Anyone doubts Khimari is a Blue Mage? FFVII doesnt have classes. ¿Anyone doubts Cid is a Dragoon? ¿Yuffie is a ninja? ¿Tifa a monk? FFIX doesnt have classes... So Vivi isn`t a black mage then, and Zidane isn`t a thief, kay.
You dont have to add a "title" under the character names, FF characters always fit one class archetype more than others by pure correlation of skills/stats/performance. Leon was a DRK, and his best weapon was a spear, shocking.
You said its against ff-history when samurai isn't a tank. so. What made the Samurai in FF5 and 6 more to a Tank than the Dark Knight? In these two games the Samurai only has offensive skills and if he defends, then only because the opponents strike so incredibly weak that even a BLM could tank.
1 DPS skill is proof of a class being a DPS. Okno, Cyan is one of the best DPS classes and is a Samurai, ok, thats one... Now, look for the samurai class all over.
In fact, Samurai class actually doesnt fit in neither, DPS or Tank roles, is more of a very balanced class, usually has more evasion than vitality, usually has good DPS but no one near pure DPS classes and also has support skills, even movement skills. And is really uncommon, actually really few characters in FFs fit in the samurai role since it is more a jack-of-all-trades class, Cyan and Auron are both "samurai" and they are very diferent.
FF2: Was somewhat tanky I guess? No particular abilities that suited it.
FF3 DS: Not a tank
FF4:Arguable but I'd say no because if you think they're a tank here then you think Dragoons were tanks as well. Drk/DRG were better at taking hits than the other party members but Paladin was the only true tank imo.
FFT wotl: Obviously not a tank
FFX-2: Not a tank
FF11: Not a tank
Bravely Default: Not a tank