There's nothing wrong with ARC, BRD just has the benefit of you know, buffing the party in a world where there's a lack of a dedicated buffer xD.
The main reason I wish they'd go with the route of FFIII/FFV/XI setup, but ah well.
Printable View
There's nothing wrong with ARC, BRD just has the benefit of you know, buffing the party in a world where there's a lack of a dedicated buffer xD.
The main reason I wish they'd go with the route of FFIII/FFV/XI setup, but ah well.
Or just change the party bonus. Instead of say having a full party buff, for every member in the party you have of a certain job you will get a stat bonus that isn't stackable. Paladin could be defense and hp ( ironic i know), warrior could be attack power, archer accuracy and crit rate, monk attack speed blm refresh and dragoon tp bonus, white mage could give regen to everyone in party. Something along those lines would give us an incentive to use a diverse party and all of those bonuses are all really great things you would want to have in a party.
Tested Dragoon last night and gotta say I love the changes...
Also from JP players blog post on lodestone: http://lodestone.finalfantasyxiv.com...entry?e=369978
Before Power Surge - Physical Attack at 577, after Power Surge rank3 (max) 923
+346 Physical Attack... /drool
Just randomly wondering but... With the addition of things like Invigorate, Blood for Blood, Keen Strike and other support-type abilities wouldn't Archer be a superior DD to Bard?
If any of you check my Lodestone you'll see my ARC ain't even level 20 so obviously I don't have the slightest idea, so that is why i'm asking.
I don't play arc or brd much at all, but I'd say you're probably correct on that. However, I lead groups, that's what I do in this game. The thing is, if you're gonna bring ranged dd, why bring ARCs, when you can bring BLMs for MUCH more dps? So really all the added dps from ARC amounts to is better soloing on ARC vs BRD.