Instead of a bubble butt he's got a bumble butt.
Thousands and thousands of years of documented Patriarchy in 99% of all society.
I think you are conflating Neo-Feminism with modern Feminism. Neo-Feminism is a small counter-movement that believes Women are superior to Men, and that Women should conform to gender roles, rather than seeking equality.
Look, Women can do whatever they like, if they want to do historically "feminine" things then that's their choice. My issue is when society tells you what a Woman should do. If a Woman wants to stay home and be a housewife and cook and clean, it should be because it's something she chooses to do, not because society dictates that it's something she should do, as a Woman.
There is no inherent Masculine or Feminine activities, or interests. Only thousands of years of men, the ruling class, the church, telling women what they can and can't do.
Sorry but that's just BS. You can't just say something and then say the burden of proof is on other to disprove you, that's not how the world works at all. Otherwise I could make any insane claim I wanted and say the burden is on you to prove me wrong.
Not different than trying to state something as "the truth" and just giving a vague (and generic) argument. And when asked for more solid stuff is responded with "is not my job to educate you".Quote:
Sorry but that's just BS. You can't just say something and then say the burden of proof is on other to disprove you, that's not how the world works at all. Otherwise I could make any insane claim I wanted and say the burden is on you to prove me wrong.
Then how you explain the overrepresentation of women/men in certain sectors that still happens today even a myriad of measures has been put in place?Quote:
There is no inherent Masculine or Feminine activities, or interests
I get your point about the free choice. I have nothing against that.
But the matter of patriarchy is far more and subtile than that and sometimes, the "documented" patriarchy is often just the view from the XIX/XXth bourgeoisie (or what mainstrem journalism or school teachers keep as "historical truth") . For many people from low classes they were just doing what they can in order to survive. Women were helping in the fields too. It's just it was more easy to give the activity that require the most strenght to men and to keep someone to take care of the children and to deal with the farmyard. We can't be in two place in the same time.
This said, I agree monotheisms are pretty patriarchals.
About feminism and neo-feminism. Maybe. The thing that makes me sad is when women clame they want to act the same way than men, despising courteousness. It is even worst when they talk a way that lets think they would prefer to be one on these primitive brainless proud arm rather than both feminine and wise...
When you haven't been pandered to in five minutes and REALLY want to complain about it.
No one. Not one single female beauty in this game compares to my lord, Zenos.
For the most part I agree with you, but I'm willing to give Halone's Mail a pass because it's clearly aiming for a classical "war goddess" look rather than functional armour - seeing as Halone is the war goddess of the Eorzean pantheon, and it's consistent with in-game statues of her.
I'm also guessing you may not have looked too closely at the male version beyond noting that it doesn't have an exposed chest, because what it has instead is far more ridiculous-looking. That's not just a pattern on the metal, it's a whole 3D bust of Halone that juts out of the chest armour. Probably-unintended visual pun aside, I have no idea what they might have been thinking when they did that. It looks awful.
The dragoon mail is a different thing entirely, since that is designed as functional battle armour in conservative (and cold!) Ishgard. Everything about it goes against design sense.
Re: dragoon armor
Apart from agreeing on the hate of the chest window on females, I'd add the ninja one. Perfectly nice and functional on males, miniskirt and fishnet stockings on females. What?