Yikes, he's not defending SE lol, he's cynically saying "They're a massive corporation that only cares about $$ of course they're going to charge for eye color changes".
ehh...why do I get the feeling I'm being baited
Printable View
I didn't notice that mainly because doomer mentality in these forums is generally used to describe someone who's saying the game is dying. Not used to describe a white knight. And I didn't pick up on the context since english isn't my first language.
Other than my very first post where I finished with "So make a new character or pay. Those are your options." (which was also 11 days ago), tell me, where am I telling people to stop asking for it? I'm simply pointing out why it won't happen.
I'm entitled to post on these forums as well as anyone else. Just because you don't like my opinion doesn't mean I need to stop posting. And as long as people will respond to me I will respond as well.
I never said you're not allowed to post your opinion, but I am allowed to tell you your takes are bad. When you want something, you ask for it. If you want something to change, you ask and/or petition for it, which is what I did. Telling people to make new accounts or whip out their wallets is being contrarian to the entire point of the original post, which was to garner support for this change, and thus your posts come across as discouraging us from asking for this change because we can "just make a new account" and that it's our fault we made our character this way and don't want to pay for every eye colour change.
If you think they shouldn't change it, that input would add more to the discussion than telling us why they won't change it.
I am adding to the discussion though. I'm adding the opposition as to why it won't happen. Just because you created the thread doesn't mean everyone needs to agree with your take.
I'm also hoping to add the effect of reducing the amount of sales of fantas so we can get changes in the future. Granted that was a bit aggressive with my first post (was having a bad day, it happens to all of us).
Did you say my takes were bad??? You may have implied/thought it but the only thing you really said was being sarcastic about it. *here's what you said
About starting arguments. Last I checked, I wasn't the one calling others multi million company white knights.
Girls, please, you're both very pretty.
We all know that the massive corporation only cares about $$. Thurmnmurmn is only posting that to rile people up and using it as a stance to be contrarian with.
You're calling out the wrong person for baiting. And I mean, is there really even a question about it? We're talking about someone that's cancelled their subscription, still comes on the forums, and has outright acknowledged that they enjoy stirring up trouble here. Most everything being said on this last page was unnecessary.
Funny considering you and the op have been the ones confronting me about my stance. Like I said before, aside from my very first post from 11 days ago, where have I told anyone what they can and can't do.
Last page was just me explaining my stance while you and the op just assume the worst of me.
Like I joked about in the last page. Can you call it derailing if it's the op doing it?
Baby's first debate