You don't pay for content you pay to be able to log in on the servers, that's literally it.
So no. Be happy they haven't increased the price due to inflation.
印刷プレビュー
You don't pay for content you pay to be able to log in on the servers, that's literally it.
So no. Be happy they haven't increased the price due to inflation.
That's a good point. But why is that? It's because the industry has conditioned their customers to always expect shinier graphics because that's easier marketable in a trailer or picture. Too bad that stuff is expensive but good luck being AAA and not at least looking the part.
So games are made so risk-averse and broad along with ridiculous advertising budgets that dwarf the production costs of the literal game itself so enough people buy it. That is just crazy.
And also happening in a world where indies exist that time and again prove how creatively bankrupt AAA is.
Kinda like Hollywood but with a controller.
Again, it's only a matter of time before the whole thing collapses in on itself. I mean nowadays it's expected of a game to not even work after a day one patch. Look no further than FFXV and XIV 1.0.
As I said in the beginning, at least FF under YoshiP is polished. So that's something. lol
personally, despite some gripes with the game, I think I get more than my.. 50 cents a day worth.
if they increase the cost, maybe it'll be 60 cents... considering more people spend more than that a day on one coffee, doesnt seem like its enough to go mental over
Have fun failing to prove that.
Costs go up annually. Budgets will increase if only to cover those increased costs. Not all game revenue is generated through the subscription and expansion "box price" though the increasing number of subscriptions expansion over expansion picks up a lot of those increased costs.
As for patch content, planning for new content types takes a lot more effort than planning for new additions to existing content.
The last thing you want is for the subscription price to be lowered so they're forced into monetization through microtransactions, lootboxes and other usually predatory designs. Unless maybe you're a whale that enjoys showing off how much money you spend.
all those “ just 1 coffee a day” keep adding up.
Also, SE doesn’t use local pricing for different countries. Except for a few countries, players are tied to a vast region, cannot change that region and for many that means being tied to USD or another foreign currency and being at the mercy of currency fluctuation (plus bad exchange rates + fees). Atm due to that, my sub went up from under $16 to almost $22 (+ fees and tax). For some other countries, it is much worse and the price, when converted to local currency, has more than doubled. For a few lucky ones it has decreased. I wish I could at least change my region to UK as I would still pay about $16 given that the subprice remains at £8.99 (about $11USD). Atm, the US sub price is the most expensive.
Currencies have become more diluted and mean less. So to not increase the subscription price has been interesting. It is reasonable to think they are losing money by not increasing it as currencies get diluted. Perhaps it is made up for by the increase in the people playing the game. In conclusion, it should not reduce.
If someone can't find the money for a subscription fee then they may need to focus on real life because otherwise how are they paying for food?Quote:
as spending power for the average person is falling globally.
1 extreme trial that is farmed, things such as Island Sanctuary, Variant, Criterion, Savage, Ultimate, Alliance Raids, custom deliveries, 3 beast tribes, PvP rewards. Yes.Quote:
Do you think that $60 is a fair price for a half hour of MSQ, 1 dungeon, and 1 trial?
What? Subscription fees are nowhere close to that for 1 month.Quote:
$60 is a reasonable price per patch?
I think the $15 sub fee is fine. But what they should lower is the cost of having retainers. It's a fun and essential part of the game that just most people get to miss out on because they're limited to two. I think they should just give you four free, and then max it out if you want to pay $20 a month.
Also they need to make everything (but the boosts) on the mogstore accountwide. Period. End of story. I'd get more stuff if that was the case. Say how useless alts are all you want. It is actually essential if you want to join more than one FC, or be able to be competitive and BiS in more than one job at a time. Hell even if you just want to RP as a different race or just play the game more casually on a different identity so stalkers can't harass you. If you buy it, on your account... it should be useable... on your account. Not tied to the character.
Unless you're playing 40 characters, I recommend swapping to the Entry Level version of the sub.
Something a lot of people seems to forget when talking about subs, is that servers are a thing that need to be maintained. I'm talking about the actual, physical servers.
That's what the sub fee goes to. You get access to log in, and in return, the servers are kept in good conditions.
Also, OP, you're ignoring the budget increase it's noticeable. You can see it on more elaborated cutscenes and visuals in general (like the upcoming graphics update). You hear it in the gradual increase in voiced cutscenes from HW to EW.
The budget doesn't go to development alone, it goes to a lot of things.
Due to inflation, we have already had a price decrease in the equivalent of $4.50 as what was $15.00 back then is now the equivalent of $19.50 in today's money but were still paying $15.00.
All the NA servers were in poor condition a few nights ago actually...
Just a shot from a big thread that was up on the main FFXIV subreddit before anyone decides to call me a liar.
https://i.imgur.com/aetVmfw.png
The FFXIV cash shop is essentially cosmetic. When you get a sub, you get full access to the game features. I abandoned all the f2p games I tried to play as you are practically forced to purchase several items, some regularly, to make the game playable. It’s f2p only in name unless you don’t mind a seriously gimped gaming experience. I prefer to pay a fixed amount and not have to bother with micro transactions.
That doesn’t take into account currency fluctuations for all the non US players forced to pay in USD. In my case, because of that, I pay way more than what it would be with just inflation.
That's not the servers though, that's the network outside them lol.
That is XIV up website is also not a great indicator because it just pings the servers from where it's located. If the bad network node is in its path, it's going to show problems. Meanwhile, people who's path doesn't take that node will have zero issues.
We had raid the night those issues were reported, and no one in my group had issues. I have someone in Orlando, 2 in Ohio, 1 near Chicago, one near Detroit, one in Oklahoma, and I'm near Seattle.
with the amount and quality of content we got in endwalker the game should have been sub free.
Still an issue isn't it? I'm willing to admit that they don't have control over the nodes, but they do have influence over them that they refuse to exert because they don't care about those of us outside of JP.
Anyways, a lot of people did have issues. There's 89 replies on the thread I snipped. I had issues, as well as most everyone in Eureka with me at the time.
But that's just a whole thread of individuals' words against you and your static. It's kind of silly to reach into individual experiences as a means of disproving/proving something. It's not like we can't tell from your post history that you love SE with all your heart and that you'll defend them regardless of the situation.
This seems like a hot take but I have to agree, and I haven't played the game even close to 10 years. It's not that people are playing the game for a long time and getting used to the formula. The formula is stale because it's 2023 and devs either don't know how to change it up or don't want to. My point being it is clearly growing increasingly irritating for some players to pay the sub...whether it's the content or the servers.
SWtoR ftp is dreadful. I consider it unplayable: can't raid , can't get artifact armor, limited inventory and credits plus other inconveniences. And housing on swtor is boring and uninspiring: you can only place certain items on predetermined plates with little to no room for creativity. They could get rid of all my strongholds there I wouldn't even notice.
The price was grandfathered in back when FFXIV used to be touted as a competitor to WoW, which has the same price. Square Enix has changed directions, though, and instead of being a competitor, it's more like an add-on. FFXIV in 2023 just fills in the missing social aspect that's missing from other games, without adding gameplay content to compete with them. So you can raid in WoW then go clubbing in FFXIV and so on. It's not meant to provide additional gameplay burden for players. And in that aspect, it should likely be priced accordingly. Much like add-ons on your movie streaming subscriptions never double the price of your sub, but only add a small extra fee, otherwise people wouldn't buy it.
Also, FFXIV is a completely different genre than what it used to be. It's more like Second Life than WoW. Seriously, most of the new content added to the game is player-generated. If you know, you know. Sticking to the stock content in 2023 is like playing Gmod on gm_flatgrass. So what is the sub even used for?
And an East Coast Data Center would help, how? Cross-datacenter play is a thing. Your East Coast Data Center has issues because of Internet provider. It's your raid night, and everyone has travelled to a West Coast Data Center in order to raid. Too bad NTT/Comcast/<insert your own Internet Provider here> screwed up.
The truth of the matter is that multiple data centers in a region are just as susceptible to outside networking problems as single data centers in a region. Most of the "89 replies" you mentioned (yeah, I read through them) were along the line of "it's problematic" and "what the heck NTT?", not "this could be resolved by SE, they don't care because <mumble mumble> Japan".
"It's not like we can't tell from your post history that you love SE with all your heart and that you'll defend them regardless of the situation."
Don't have anything useful to say? Just said "it's kind of silly to reach into individual experiences" after providing "89 replies" that do exactly that? Slander the poster. Classic.
You don't know the meaning of the world slander. My point when I said it's silly to reach into individual experiences was that I too could reference other people's experiences with an issue that someone claimed didn't exist, and that neither should be considered more valid than the other as it always comes down to a case of, "he said, she said" or conflicting statements. As for my comment on their post history, what do you want me to say? It wasn't meant to hurt their feelings, merely to point out their bias.
As for the rest, no one mentioned it, but it's always been an issue from what I've heard during the major times there's been a good portion of the playerbase having connection issues with the game. Every year there seems to be some moment in time where some portion of the playerbase has connection issues due to whatever is going on between NTT and their ISP. It's consistently always NTT that's the issue, regardless of the other ISPs involved. SE has a partnership with NTT, so they have some degree of influence there. I'm not an expert on the situation and I'll admit it, but I feel like you can come to this conclusion with a bit of logic.
Anyways, fix your attitude. Again, you talk about slander, but you got aggressive, mocked me and even went as far as to make claims that I made statements that I had not. At least I'm somewhat civil with my replies.
Take FFXI as an example. They are done with content. Their sub hasn't gone down. They've been pretty much done with content for years.