Originally Posted by
Iscah
I still don't know what you are picturing that makes genderlocking better.
As far as I can see:
Scenario 1 (with genderlocking): they make onemale and one female hairstyle. Everybody gets one chance to receive a hairstyle they like.
Scenario 2 (no genderlocking): they make the same male and female hairstyle. Everyone has the same chance to like the hairstyle intended for their character's gender BUT ALSO a smaller second chance to also like the hairstyle intended for the other gender.
In the second scenario you are not getting anything less, while people with other tastes are getting the same amount or more. Thus my conclusion that you could only object if you dislike the idea that some people might like both styles while you only like one.
Besides, arbitrary genderlocking to male and female styles isn't going to stop some of those male styles from being not manly enough for your taste. Either that or never again giving people who like boyish anime-protagonist styles what they want. It is a fact that you will not like every hairstyle released for your gender, regardless of your taste.
For my own case, two of my male characters have long hair and any alternate styles I might want to use for them would also be long. Genderlocked styles would tie them into the likeliness that future hairstyles for them will be short while any long ones will be female-only.
A simple, longer style would work for them, but then why shouldn't female characters also have access to that?
Estinien's hair is probably a good reference point. If that got brought out as a player hairstyle, not linked to an existing character, what would you classify it as? Another feminine style, why aren't there any masculine ones?