well of course but ur not understanding me i had a way low benchmark score for both yet i played 1.0 on medium so with the same be said for the 2.0 version is my question im not made out of money so i cant upgrade my pc so.
Benchmark Questions
Printable View
-
02-23-2013, 04:12 AMlolodin
-
02-23-2013, 04:21 AMMeatdawg
1.0 was more demanding then ARR
If you could play 1.0 you can play ARR -
02-23-2013, 04:25 AMCedri
As a computer tech, I looked on in horror at the specs you were trying to game on...
-
02-23-2013, 04:28 AMArkh
Buy the ps3 version then, is cheap
-
02-23-2013, 04:30 AMlolodinlol it wasnt badQuote:
Originally Posted by Cedri
and @Arkh i have a ps3 :P -
02-23-2013, 04:34 AMArkh
If you have a ps3, get the game on that. And use the pc for the voice chat part :D
-
02-23-2013, 04:38 AMCedriLet me put this into a bit of perspective for you. I'm not trying to be a douche or anything, but your computer is outdated. Passmark if you're not familiar with it has a chart of all high, mid range and low end cards. Your graphics card does not even EXIST on any of those lists.Quote:
Originally Posted by lolodin
Edit: my mistake it does exist it scored 93 out of a possibe 5,548 -
02-23-2013, 04:44 AMlolodinI know my computer is Outdated ive said multiple times it sucks lol but for it being this crappy i had few problems with playing the game i am just curious on how accurate or inaccurate the benchmark is thats itQuote:
Originally Posted by Cedri
-
02-23-2013, 04:52 AMCedriIt's 90% accurate.Quote:
Originally Posted by lolodin
-
02-23-2013, 05:01 AMSignyYeap, you'll probably could play ARR on you pc but with everything as low as possible and getting low fps on crowed areas.Quote:
Originally Posted by Cedri