Can we point out to how bad it is that SE bends the knee to chan brigades?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Lihtleita

this is a jp game, smoking pot will land you in jail

---

Really? Good thing then that I smoke weed and not pot :D

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Payadopa

Someone points at someone else using 3rd party tools and SE bans them because they are using 3rd party tools. I see no issue with that.

---

Lol, this just isn't the case though. Are you really that oblivious to all the complaints, threads and so forth everywhere complaining about how obvious bots and cheaters weren't getting banned despite being reported? Even if we ignore Eureka bots and so forth, remember the outrage over that BLM in Gordias with the 2 second GCD? They never got banned for that.

Someone pointing at someone else using 3rd party tools isn't going to get someone banned. There's over 10 years of evidence right here on these forums that document exactly that.

This is about it requiring mass reporting from 5ch to make it happen. No matter which side of the camp you're on with ToS breaking mods. This is wrong.

If someone is obviously cheating, it should probably be addressed fairly, irrespective of if they get 2 reports or 200.

The number of reports shouldn't decide the severity of the punishment. That's just wrong and there's a very big reason why reality doesn't work like this.

It's about time they correct their mistake, yes. Wagging a finger isn't as effective. And with the increase of popularity and people pushing the envelope more and more it's high time they took action.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by gotaname1

Topic. The precedence it sets is a very bad one. It shows how bad SE deals with reports and customer relations in general.

---

Completely incorrect. Regardless of the # of people that make a report someone from SE reviews the information before making a final decision on the matter.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Payadopa

We log in, we agree to the ToS for better or worse

---

Per EU Court of Justice ruling EULAs and ToS are legally irrelevant. Too bad companies get away with them still because EU has to waste time with never ending anti-consumer practices of big fish like Apple.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Reap00

Completely incorrect. Regardless of the # of people that make a report someone from SE reviews the information before making a final decision on the matter.

---

Completely incorrect? It makes clear the reporting system actually is a voting system since SE only acted upon getting X number of reports without really thinking about the contents (or consequences of acting on them) of those reports.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by gotaname1

Topic. The precedence it sets is a very bad one. It shows how bad SE deals with reports and customer relations in general.

---

it won't matter if ToS weren't broken.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by gotaname1

Completely incorrect? It makes clear the reporting system actually is a voting system since SE only acted upon getting X number of reports without really thinking about the contents (or consequences of acting on them) of those reports.

---

prove it.

Gotta say current events really pulled out the trolls on this forum.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Somnolence

Per EU Court of Justice ruling EULAs and ToS are legally irrelevant. Too bad companies get away with them still because EU has to waste time with never ending anti-consumer practices of big fish like Apple.

---

Good. Authority should always be questioned, even if it is authority you agree with sometimes or often.

What is a "chan brigade"?