The console is sooooo small.
I don't think that will be more powerful than PS4.
I don't want another low-end console limiting the game. o.o
Printable View
The console is sooooo small.
I don't think that will be more powerful than PS4.
I don't want another low-end console limiting the game. o.o
It is speculation based of other's findings, not my own. Everything looks like it was customized specifically for the Nintendo Switch. Plus I said comparable. It can be in the lesser or better range depending on how well people can push the hardware to it's limits.
Specs of the Nintendo Switch, it could run FFXIV but I'm sure no one wants to deal with "Nintendo Switch limitations" as we just rid of the PS3. Square Enix is a partner for the Switch so it's possible. It also runs on the ARM architecture so porting it over would be a huge effort, unlikely to be worth it.
Oh, I see. Thanks for the reply. Yeah, from my understanding, Tegra processors are notoriously worse than GTX/Radeon graphics cards, and IIRC Xbox one uses a Radeon. That doesn't necessarily mean it's worse, but with the information available, I made that assumption.
It's marketed as a home console that can switch to a handheld. That said, I agree with the rest of what you said.
Could be wrong, but those specs seem pretty bad. Don't they? Also, are those specs confirmed?
They're pretty bad tbh, but I don't know why people expected PS4 performance out of a portable device. As for whether or not they confirmed, well I got them from a friend who got them off another friend from the Nintendo developer portal (requires an account)... can't say it's 100% legitimate, but I trust them both.
http://pastebin.com/UD1Vx9rf
According to Switch specs.
Capacity of 4 GB
Bandwidth: 25.6 GB/s
PS4 for comparison
Capacity 8 gigs of RAM
176 GB/s
PS4's RAM is SEVEN times faster. This thing is not even in the same league because it's a handheld.